I would also suggest declaring empty virtual destructors for any
inherited classes for which you have no specific
need for a destructor. I dont really know why this should be necessary,
but for some reason (at least in the past)
I have found this necessary, and now do it as a habit.
An isolated
--- Nick Liebmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Following on from this, I'd be inclined to check that all of your
> destructors are declared as virtual, and you are not deleting objects
> multiple times.
>
>
At first I want to thank you all for the replies.
To give a high level rundown o
I am not sure the virtuality of a destructor is inherited but definitly
with the gnu compiler I have had issues where not declaring a virtual
destructor causes a whole host of problems.
From what I remember when playing with this stuff on g++ 2.95 the only
time calling 'delete this' caused me g
Thread definately is declared with a virtual destructor, and so is
Socket. TCPStream, inherited from Socket, also redeclares a virtual
destructor, and TCPSession has no declared destructor at all, although
it inherits both TCPStream and Thread. I am not sure what his
"TCPSessionThread" has, a
Following on from this, I'd be inclined to check that all of your
destructors are declared as virtual, and you are not deleting objects
multiple times.
Nick
David Sugar wrote:
Hmm...perhaps it is a dynamic casting issue. The thread close method
itself is only really aware of a "Thread" object
In fact, I will go a step further...Thread() is built with a virtual
destructor...it appears to me that virtual destructors are not working
correcting on your compiler. This would explain the memory offset of
the delete free() operation in Thread::close, which I am guessing is
likely the offse
Hmm...perhaps it is a dynamic casting issue. The thread close method
itself is only really aware of a "Thread" object as the base class
itself, at that point in time. If it is unable to handle the delete of
the derived virtual object by recasting the pointer references, then
perhaps the order
Hello again,
Ia currently doing some restructuring on the program that I had probelms
with few moths ago. I just poke my editor into some very nasty stuff and
I'd like to ask if any of you have any idea why I do get a buch of Invalid
pointer error messages.
The program is heavily threaded "Mess
