Hi David,
> From: David Sugar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 22:50
>
> Build Bayonne? :)...The individual demos and test programs generally
> should be buildable and are fairly easy to follow. Even the current
> tests don't act as a full or complete regression, but t
Build Bayonne? :)...The individual demos and test programs generally
should be buildable and are fairly easy to follow. Even the current
tests don't act as a full or complete regression, but they should give a
generally good idea of whether is something important is broken fairly
quickly.
Co
Hi David,
> From: David Sugar
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 21:50
>
> The other question to confirm is whether something links with it (such
> as the demo apps). That is where interesting things could be quickly
> identified, particularly I find in the windows builds on anything that
> effe
void SerialEcho::run() {
char* s = new char[getBufferSize()];
cout << "start monitor" << endl;
while (s[0] != 'X') {
while (isPending(Serial::pendingInput)) {
cout.put( TTYStream::get() );
}
sleep(500);
}
cout << "end of monitor" << endl;
delete [] s;
exit();
* Install an ARM & Linux cross compile tool set. Mine is:
debzfp:~$ ls /opt/cross/bin
arm-linux-addr2line arm-linux-gccarm-linux-objdump
arm-linux-ar arm-linux-gcc-3.3.2 arm-linux-ranlib
arm-linux-as arm-linux-gccbug arm-linux-readelf
arm-linux-c++arm-linux-g
Hi David,
> From: Conrad T. Pino
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:38
>
> > From: David Sugar
> > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 07:48
> >
> > This may be readyI was actually looking for something to consider
> > for a point release today since I am also doing a new cape build, and
> > res
The other question to confirm is whether something links with it (such
as the demo apps). That is where interesting things could be quickly
identified, particularly I find in the windows builds on anything that
effects platform sdk versions.
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
Hi David,
From: Conrad T.
Hi David,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Sugar
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 16:35
> To: Conrad T. Pino
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug Common C++
> Subject: Re: No "configure" script in CVS?
>
> Yes, that is true, there are thi
Yes, that is true, there are things needed by reconfig, including
automake and autoconf. Not only that, but different versions of
automake and autoconf will build somewhat different configure scripts.
Generally one can assume that the version of configure built locally
definately works for the
A later step in reconfig automatically rebuilds aclocal.m4. You can
ignore that message.
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
When I run "./reconfig" immediately after a CVS checkout I get this message:
You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to `aclocal.m4'.
A subsequent run in the
When I run "./reconfig" immediately after a CVS checkout I get this message:
You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to `aclocal.m4'.
A subsequent run in the same directory doesn't repeat the message.
Should I be concerned?
Should I take some action?
What does the messag
I'm compiling for Linux 2.6 Intel CPU as I write.
Thank you. The "./reconfig" needs specific tools and
getting them makes me love the Debian package system.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Sugar
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005
configure is generated in a cvs checkout from ./reconfig
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
Hi David,
There is no "configure" script in the CVS archive.
How do I bring one into existence on Linux 2.6?
Conrad
begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Telephony
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PR
Hi David,
There is no "configure" script in the CVS archive.
How do I bring one into existence on Linux 2.6?
Conrad
___
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
Bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
Hi David,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Sugar
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 07:48
> To: Conrad T. Pino
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug Common C++
> Subject: Re: Patch: Windows Platform SDK - IPv6 - Borland C++ Builder
> 6.0 - Wi
This may be readyI was actually looking for something to consider
for a point release today since I am also doing a new cape build, and
resolving this problem is very worth considering.
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
Hi David,
From: David Sugar
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 13:52
To: Conrad T.
This patch depends upon another patch regarding:
Windows Platform SDK - IPv6 - Borland C++ Builder 6.0 - Windows 2000
and fixes all Borland C++ Builder 6.0 compile errors.
Index: include/cc++/file.h
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/gn
Hi David,
> From: David Sugar
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 13:52
> To: Conrad T. Pino
> Cc: Bug Common C++
> Subject: Re: Windows Platform SDK - IPv6 - Borland C++ Builder 6.0 -
> Windows 2000
>
> Yes, ipv6 and platformsdk have an odd entanglement at the moment. The
> default I choose, act
18 matches
Mail list logo
