Since the commoncpp layer is kept separate specifically for maintaining
compatibility, even a 6.0 release of ucommon core should not effect
ccrtp at all. At some point I think we should migrate ccrtp (and
libcppzrtp) to ucommon, but there is no near-term plan for this yet.
I do recall sflphone an
- Original Message -
> From: "David Sugar"
> To: "Tristan Matthews"
> Cc: bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 4:03:46 PM
> Subject: Re: "gaurd" typo
>
>
> >> I do recall sflphone and I would love to see it adopt srtp and
> >> zrtp.
> >
> > We do currently support sr
>> I do recall sflphone and I would love to see it adopt srtp and zrtp.
>
> We do currently support srtp and zrtp, albeit with an older version of ccrtp.
Very cool, and I did not know
At the very least we (I mean as in GNU Telephony) should be mentioning it...
_
- Original Message -
> From: "David Sugar"
> To: "Tristan Matthews"
> Cc: bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 12:30:21 PM
> Subject: Re: "gaurd" typo
>
> Since the commoncpp layer is kept separate specifically for
> maintaining
> compatibility, even a 6.0 release of uco
- Original Message -
> From: "David Sugar"
> To: bug-commoncpp@gnu.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 2:10:58 PM
> Subject: Re: "gaurd" typo
>
> I actually almost hate these kind of errors, because they nonetheless
> do
> touch upon linkage abi. Actually it is probably a good time to
