Re: --format flag

2003-12-16 Thread Bruce Korb
Jim Meyering wrote: > > I do not believe it would be a significant amount of work: > > If you can do it with an insignificant amount of work, that'd be great. > Have you just volunteered? ;-) My first roofing contractor was discovered to have cut through the earthquake straps holding the two ha

Re: --format flag

2003-12-16 Thread Bruce Korb
Bruce Korb wrote: > > I like the verbose names. > > Are there really three different types of syntax: %w, $w{} and ${}? Oh! Thinko. I just noticed that I substituted '$' for '%' characters. No. Snprintfv is a string formatting library that uses the normal conventions, but is extensible in that

Re: --format flag

2003-12-16 Thread Bruce Korb
> No, more like the following: (warning, these are `made-up' format directives; > it'd take some careful thought to come up with proper choices): > > ls --format="%M %I %U %G %B %D %f\n" > > Implementing something like that properly > would involve a significant amount of work. > If you're int

Re: --format flag

2003-12-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, more like the following: (warning, these are `made-up' format directives; >> it'd take some careful thought to come up with proper choices): >> >> ls --format="%M %I %U %G %B %D %f\n" >> >> Implementing something like that properly >> would involve a s

(no subject)

2003-12-16 Thread Bruce Korb
>From - Tue Dec 16 11:48:45 2003 X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:47:21 -0800 From: Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X

Simple Package Manager

2003-12-16 Thread Schachner Thomas
Hello! Have you ever wondered why you have not full control over your installed files. -> you have a rpm based system an then there is the moment that your favorite program is not available as rpm package for your distribution! You are to lazy to read all the document about generating rpm packages

[ls] undocumented exit (return) value

2003-12-16 Thread Pascal A. Dupuis
Hello, I found by trial-and-errors that 'ls' from coreutils returns a status which is not zero in case of problems like no file matching a given pattern. I think such cases should be documented in the man and info pages, to clarify exactly which situations lead to such a non-zero exit status. I u

Re: patch for 'df', --total from TODO

2003-12-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Chris Van Nuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Browsing through the TODO list for coreutils I found the > request that a --total option be added to 'df' to summarize > the total blocksize, Used, and Available. I've written a > patch to do that, and I'd like your input as to it