Re: Question about NIST listing

> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Philip Rowlands wrote: > >> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, David Highley wrote: > > > Is it in the plans for running the SHA2 tests to get the sha256sum > > sha384sum and sha512sum programs listed as tested on the NIST site? > > Probably not. I don't recall any mention of such validat

[patch #3286] printf "%c" (integer) outputs first digit instead of a character

Update of patch #3286 (project coreutils): Status:None => Invalid ___ Follow-up Comment #1: POSIX requires the current behavior, where the argument that matches up to %c is treated as

Re: Question about NIST listing

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, David Highley wrote: Is it in the plans for running the SHA2 tests to get the sha256sum sha384sum and sha512sum programs listed as tested on the NIST site? Probably not. I don't recall any mention of such validation in my time following this mailing list, and there's nothi

[patch #1586] erroneous comment in info for `date --date +`

Update of patch #1586 (project coreutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: _

[patch #4774] Fix when piping and --color=always. This patch calls restore_default_color() after the last file and before the last

Update of patch #4774 (project coreutils): Status:None => Duplicate Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: see patch #4775

Question about NIST listing

Is it in the plans for running the SHA2 tests to get the sha256sum sha384sum and sha512sum programs listed as tested on the NIST site? We have a need for them to be listed. Thank you. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Yep, the xml schema is the official specification from hell everyone > wants to forget But if it's the official one, it's the one that "date" should conform to, no? > it'll get superseded by something more sane

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 16:24 -0800, Paul Eggert a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time > > format > > I just looked at and it appears that > > (1) There are 9 for

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time > format I just looked at and it appears that (1) There are 9 formats, not 1. (2) There is no way to represent a leap second. This is not normal

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 22:15 +0100, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The full format used in the note, save the fractional part of a second, > >> can be specified as: > >> > >> $ date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H-%M-%S%:z' > >> 2006-01-08T19-29-44+00:00 > > > > It's

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The full format used in the note, save the fractional part of a second, >> can be specified as: >> >> $ date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H-%M-%S%:z' >> 2006-01-08T19-29-44+00:00 > > It's a pity about the fractional part - it's useful when you need to > generate unique

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 19:35 +, Philip Rowlands a écrit : > On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time > > format people can actually use : > > http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime > > The W3 consortium has received

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

Philip Rowlands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Note to maintainers - %Z does not appear separately in the 5.93 > manpage. I don't know enough texinfo or troff to suggest a fix, sorry.) Thanks. I've just fixed that: * src/date.c (usage): Adjust the formatting of the entries for %::z

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time format people can actually use : http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime The W3 consortium has received a proposal, from Reuters, for a subset of ISO 8601, which has been marked "This docu

XML-like date/time support ?

Hi, The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time format people can actually use : http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime (based on the ISO 8601 spec, keeping only what's really needed) Unfortunately it can not be produced by shell scripts using the "date" command. The main pro

[patch #4775] Fix for --color=always and piping.

URL: Summary: Fix for --color=always and piping. Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: None Submitted on: Sun 01/08/06 at 18:14 Category: None

[patch #4774] Fix when piping and --color=always. This patch calls restore_default_color() after the last file and before the last

URL: Summary: Fix when piping and --color=always. This patch calls restore_default_color() after the last file and before the last Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: None