Problem with join

2007-05-14 Thread Slawek Zak
Hi, It seems to me that EMPTY field printing in join is borked, or I am misguided. Here is a minimal example: join -e EMPTY -o 1.1 1.2 2.2 /tmp/a /dev/null /tmp/a being single line: b 2 I think that the output should be b 2 EMPTY not none like it is with included in coreutils 6.9. Best

Re: Problem with join

2007-05-14 Thread Jim Meyering
Slawek Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that EMPTY field printing in join is borked, or I am misguided. Here is a minimal example: join -e EMPTY -o 1.1 1.2 2.2 /tmp/a /dev/null /tmp/a being single line: b 2 I think that the output should be b 2 EMPTY not none like it is with

Re: chmod octal form of sgid/suid removal fails

2007-05-14 Thread Paul Eggert
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well and good, but it seems to me that writing an explicit 0 actually does make an explicit request. This topic came up when I first added that feature, and originally I agreed with you, but others did not and their arguments were persuasive. The

NEWS item for head -c 1G, etc.

2007-05-14 Thread Paul Eggert
I forgot to include a NEWS item for the May 2 change on size suffixes. Sorry about that. Here it is: 2007-05-14 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * NEWS: Mention the suffix change installed on 2007-05-02. diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index ea3aafb..ed3ab49 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@

Re: chmod octal form of sgid/suid removal fails

2007-05-14 Thread Paul Eggert
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then the manpgea is broken instead:; Thanks for mentioning that. Here is a patch to the man page. 2007-05-14 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * man/chmod.x: Document chmod's behavior with setuid and setgid bits. Remove misleading

Re: chmod octal form of sgid/suid removal fails

2007-05-14 Thread John Cowan
(Apologies to those, if any, who got an earlier version of this message.) Paul Eggert scripsit: The counterargument is that it's strange if a leading zero changes the semantics of a number, as this is not what many people expect. Fair enough. However, if the directory has mode 6755 and you

Re: chmod octal form of sgid/suid removal fails

2007-05-14 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for mentioning that. Here is a patch to the man page. 2007-05-14 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * man/chmod.x: Document chmod's behavior with setuid and setgid bits. Remove misleading implication about leading zero. Problem