In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm.
This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils
now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly for non-POSIX systems),
so please give this a work-out if you haven't built a snapshot recently:
On Monday 08 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
In addition to adding mktemp
thanks for this
so please give this a work-out if you haven't built a snapshot recently:
chcon fails on my non-selinux system during `make check` ... looks like it
should be an XFAIL when selinux support is disabled
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
chcon fails on my non-selinux system during `make check` ... looks like it
should be an XFAIL when selinux support is disabled
Thanks for the quick feedback.
I presume you mean the root-only tests/misc/chcon test (btw, it works for me)
If so, please
On Monday 08 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chcon fails on my non-selinux system during `make check` ... looks like
it should be an XFAIL when selinux support is disabled
Thanks for the quick feedback.
I presume you mean the root-only
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chcon fails on my non-selinux system during `make check` ... looks like
it should be an XFAIL when selinux support is disabled
Thanks for the quick feedback.
I
On Monday 08 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
This ought to make it skip:
--- a/tests/misc/chcon
+++ b/tests/misc/chcon
+. $srcdir/../selinux
this fixed it for me
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Geng) wrote:
...
The text is partitioned exactly as it is in the existing code of tail.c
(I'm
looking at a cvs archive copy from sept 9). This is from tail.c:
Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05:
In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm.
This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils
now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly for non-POSIX systems),
so please give this a work-out if you
Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05:
In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm.
This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils
now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly for non-POSIX systems),
so please give this a work-out if you
Bauke Jan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05:
In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm.
This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils
now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly for non-POSIX
Bauke Jan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05:
In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm.
This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils
now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly for non-POSIX
Hi Jim, hi Bruno,
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Koeppe wrote:
The Interix libc is built with MSVC. MSVC has no long double data
type. Ok, it understands long double, but always maps that to 64-bit
double. So libc's printf(), when it
Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before coding further, I strongly urge you to nail down the
specification -- publicly. Put it this way: write enough
details that someone reading your description in a man page
would not be disappointed.
Martin Koeppe wrote:
Is seq segfaulting on mingw and BeOS, too?
I just tested snapshot 316 and it unfortunately doesn't work on
Interix, i.e. seq is still wrong.
Can you find out why?
Interix has _ before C symbols, all the following are asm symbols. The
Interix libc has __vfprintf
I don't know if this is the right mailing list (nc isn't mentioned in any
of the lists) and I don't know if it is a real bug or not, but the GNU
version 0.7.1 of nc (the Gnu version of netcat) seems to differ from some
other versions of netcat in its treatment of EOF on the standard input.
Hi Bruno,
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Bruno Haible wrote:
Martin Koeppe wrote:
Is seq segfaulting on mingw and BeOS, too?
I just tested snapshot 316 and it unfortunately doesn't work on
Interix, i.e. seq is still wrong.
Can you find out why?
Now found out, that GNULIB_SPRINTF_POSIX and
Martin Koeppe wrote:
Now found out, that GNULIB_SPRINTF_POSIX and REPLACE_SPRINTF are set
to 0 by configure, seems to be the default value, and apparently
nowhere else get touched during configure (I only see 2 occurences of
these 2 variables in the whole configure), so stay 0 and
17 matches
Mail list logo
