On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Steve Wald wrote:
It would be real handy if sort had an option analogous to -n which would
properly handle columns of exponential notation numbers, e.g.
-9.575e-08, or even if the -n option itself would detect and sort them.
Much of my data is mixed exponential and decimal
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered adding SELinux-related format directives to GNU find?
I would likely accept such patches into find, subject to a GNU
copyright assignment of course.
More generally, a more flexible syntax for find's
Greetings coreutils folks,
There are a number of interesting filesystems (glusterfs, lustre? ... NFS)
which could benefit from userspace utilities doing certain operatings in
parallel. (I have a very slow glusterfs installation that makes me think
that some things can be done better.)
For
Andrew McGill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings coreutils folks,
There are a number of interesting filesystems (glusterfs, lustre? ... NFS)
which could benefit from userspace utilities doing certain operatings in
parallel. (I have a very slow glusterfs installation that makes me think
that
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I googled a bit about that french issue, it was already reported to
translation team. Answer was that it could be caused by translation like
report all bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of report bugs to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . I don't think so, I guess it is
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about parallelizing it via xargs, e.g.,
$ echo a b c d e f g h | xargs -t -n4 --no-run-if-empty \
--max-procs=2 -- cp --target-directory=dest
cp --target-directory=dest a b c d
cp --target-directory=dest
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 19:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I googled a bit about that french issue, it was already reported to
translation team. Answer was that it could be caused by translation like
report all bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of report
Perhaps something like the attached patch to the usage message might
be worthwhile (though I think it is probably too wordy).
James.
From 54614d88bc91d0c188108b467fb518c7d3de7c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:55:50 +
Subject: [PATCH]
Greetings: I have downloaded the new Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image and it is not
recognized by a system (CD) currently running Ubuntu 8.04. Why?
--
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
___
Bug-coreutils
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Al Jorge on 11/8/2008 4:04 PM:
Greetings: I have downloaded the new Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image and it is not
recognized by a system (CD) currently running Ubuntu 8.04. Why?
After recent Ubuntu releases there have been several people who have
James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps something like the attached patch to the usage message might
be worthwhile (though I think it is probably too wordy).
Thank you. I agree.
How about this?
From 1ae69757c63e2d0d7e1103f7d17d7d256d625e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Youngman
11 matches
Mail list logo
