AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
Jim Meyering wrote I'm beginning to think there's a fundamental problem with your system. Here's the comparable part of truss output on a working Solaris 10 system: ... Remember, you did not compile with gcc. Unless someone can suggest an alternative explanation, I'll have to assume this is

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Voelker, Bernhard wrote: Jim Meyering wrote I'm beginning to think there's a fundamental problem with your system. Here's the comparable part of truss output on a working Solaris 10 system: ... Remember, you did not compile with gcc. Unless someone can suggest an alternative explanation,

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
Jim Meyering wrote: I suspect this patch works around your compiler's inadequate bool support: diff --git a/src/install.c b/src/install.c index 73b3981..19efb1d 100644 --- a/src/install.c +++ b/src/install.c @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool extra_mode (mode_t input) { const mode_t

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshot available:coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
all non-root tests have successfully now, but one of the root-tests failed: === GNU coreutils 7.4.127-d2510: tests/test-suite.log === 1 of 1 test failed. .. contents:: :depth: 2

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshotavailable:coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Voelker, Bernhard
Voelker, Bernhard wrote: all non-root tests have successfully now, but one of the root-tests failed: === GNU coreutils 7.4.127-d2510: tests/test-suite.log === 1 of 1 test

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: new snapshot available:coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Voelker, Bernhard wrote: all non-root tests have successfully now, but one of the root-tests failed: === GNU coreutils 7.4.127-d2510: tests/test-suite.log === 1 of 1 test failed. ..

gnulib warnings while building coreutils (was: stable or not?)

2009-08-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 8/20/2009 7:59 AM: Eric Blake wrote: are more warnings in gnulib not worth fixing, but these looked obvious; meanwhile the warnings from chcon onwards halted the build since you add -Werror in src): CC

Re: gnulib warnings while building coreutils

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: ... Done (well, I see Jim wrote an email on the same subject while I was typing this email). I'm pushing this: ... Subject: [PATCH] build: avoid some compiler warnings * lib/selinux-at.h: Use dir_fd, not dirfd, to avoid shadowing. * lib/exclude.c

seq bug? LAST equals 1,000,000

2009-08-20 Thread db_23
Hi When LAST is equal to 1,000,000 (seq 1000). I got the outcome as the following. Numbers after 999,999 appears more than once, but not at fixed times. - 97 98 99 1e+06 1e+06 1e+06 1e+06 1e+06 1e+06 1.1e+06 1.1e+06 1.1e+06 1.1e+06 1.1e+06

Re: seq bug? LAST equals 1,000,000

2009-08-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to db_23 on 8/20/2009 9:06 AM: Hi When LAST is equal to 1,000,000 (seq 1000). I got the outcome as the following. Numbers after 999,999 appears more than once, but not at fixed times. 1,000,000 is not the same as 1000. What

Re: seq bug? LAST equals 1,000,000

2009-08-20 Thread Bob Proulx
db_23 wrote: When LAST is equal to 1,000,000 (seq 1000). I got the outcome as the following. Numbers after 999,999 appears more than once, but not at fixed times. Thank you for the report. Unfortunately seq uses floating point numbers internally. This has caused some problems in the

coreutils-7.5 released

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Meyering
This is to announce coreutils-7.5, a stable release. We're calling it stable in spite of the fact that there is a new program, stdbuf, and there are some interesting new features. Thanks to everyone who has been helping! For a summary of changes and contributors, see:

[patch #6896] Some programs aren't correctly appended on Cygwin.

2009-08-20 Thread Norihirio Tanaka
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?6896 Summary: Some programs aren't correctly appended on Cygwin. Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: noritnk Submitted on: 2009年08月21日 03時27分59秒 Category: None