shailesh jain wrote:
...
POSIX allows readdir to work that way.
Sorry I do not follow your comment. What way POSIX allows readdir to work ?
As was demonstrated by that strace output:
returning an entry for a file that had been unlinked.
I already suggested that making this change might help
However to get at to accept such a date, one needs:
$ at -v $(date --rfc-3339=date -d 'now + 5 years + 11 months')
Fri Oct 17 03:56:00 2014
warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
B'B How do you like these:
B'B at-ng/build% ./at now + 5 years + 11 months
B'B Job will run at or
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
For the help text, here are some alternatives:
if DEST is a directory, then delete it first
This isn't what -T does. If DEST is an empty directory then it's
overwritten with the rename(2) system call. Otherwise mv will fail e.g.
if SOURCE
Hi Sergey,
In exclude.c, we have this:
bool
excluded_file_name (struct exclude const *ex, char const *f)
{
...
switch (seg-type)
{
case exclude_pattern:
rc = excluded_file_pattern_p (seg, f);
break;
case
Hi there,
You have a broken link on the page http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
http://www.expita.com/nomime.html is expired and leads nowhere. Please
check it out.
Thanks.
Jim Meyering wrote:
Anarkia Komunismo wrote:
You have a broken link on the page http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
http://www.expita.com/nomime.html is expired and leads nowhere. Please
check it out.
Thank you.
Can anyone suggest a replacement?
Here's the latest archived copy:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
Can anyone suggest a replacement?
This is the same content, and references the expita.com URL as the
source:
http://stagecraft.theprices.net/nomime.html
Cheers,
Phil
Jim Meyering wrote:
Following up on a long thread from a year ago, here's a patch
to fix the 3.5-year-old readdir-vs-mountpoint-inode bug in ls -i.
Checked on my system and works fine...
It's a shame to have to pessimize ls -i performance, even by this
small amount on linux-based kernels,
Hi jidanni,
I'm extremely angry about you forwarding my findings to the
Debian BTS. Debian decided not to give me a vote again without
passing a full NM procedure which I don't accept, hence:
*I don't fix their bugs without having a vote*.
@ Debian's at maintainer, I hereby declare:
*You are
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Following up on a long thread from a year ago, here's a patch
to fix the 3.5-year-old readdir-vs-mountpoint-inode bug in ls -i.
Checked on my system and works fine...
It's a shame to have to pessimize ls -i performance, even by this
small amount on
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Following up on a long thread from a year ago, here's a patch
to fix the 3.5-year-old readdir-vs-mountpoint-inode bug in ls -i.
Checked on my system and works fine...
It's a shame to have to pessimize ls -i performance, even by this
small amount on
BSB == Bernd Siggy Brentrup b...@free-it.org writes:
BSB Hi jidanni,
BSB I'm extremely angry about you forwarding my findings to the
BSB Debian BTS.
Sorry. I just try to increase people's networking, and assumed the bug
number, which I saw in the Subject, had fallen off the CC list and
needed
Pádraig Brady wrote:
So there was a lot more disk access with the new binary.
but the NEWS suggests that should only be the case for
systems with dysfunctional readdir.
What was your system?
Quite ancient system... I checked this on my old Fedora Core 6...
Anyway could check with something
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
So there was a lot more disk access with the new binary.
but the NEWS suggests that should only be the case for
systems with dysfunctional readdir.
What was your system?
Quite ancient system... I checked this on my old Fedora Core 6...
Anyway
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
Yep, it has some performance impact...
checked `time ./ls -i1R /home /dev /usr /var /lib myinodes with
approximate number of 31k dirs, 450k files on ext3
and results are
old binary without the patch:
real2m5.631s
user0m3.012s
sys 0m4.815s
new binary:
FYI, clang found an unnecessary assignment.
This removes it,
From c6cc0321f3a07d4828e1043c21a468d45941850a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:37:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] maint: mbsalign.c: remove unnecessary assignment
* gl/lib/mbsalign.c
Hi Pádraig,
clang reports this:
timeout.c:330:9: warning: Uninitialized or undefined value returned to caller.
return status;
^
Even if it really can't happen (which the comment suggests), please
initialize status or ensure that we get a diagnostic and exit nonzero
if/when
Jim Meyering wrote:
Hi Pádraig,
clang reports this:
timeout.c:330:9: warning: Uninitialized or undefined value returned to
caller.
return status;
^
Even if it really can't happen (which the comment suggests), please
initialize status or ensure that we get a
Cp(1) doesn't correctly copy extended attributes for read-only files:
touch foo
setfattr -n user.key -v value foo
chmod a-w foo
cp --preserve=xattr foo bar
cp: setting attribute `user.key' for `user.key': Permission denied
If one uses cp -a instead, it simply strips the metadata and doesn't
Pádraig Brady wrote:
I'll check in the attached later on today
unless there are objections.
...
Subject: [PATCH] timeout: defensive handling of all wait() errors
* src/timeout.c (main): Handle all possible cases of unexpected
failures from wait(). This was prompted by the clang tool
20 matches
Mail list logo
