Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:48 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:50 PM, Alan Curry wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Are there so many new remote file systems coming into use now?
That are not listed in /usr/include/linux/magic.h?
The past can always be
On 12/23/2011 12:08 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:48 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:50 PM, Alan Curry wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Are there so many new remote file systems coming into use now?
That are not listed in
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:08 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:48 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:50 PM, Alan Curry wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Are there so many new remote file systems coming into use now?
That are not
On 12/23/2011 02:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:08 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:48 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:50 PM, Alan Curry wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Are there so many new remote file
Hi Gilles,
On 12/23/2011 02:45 PM, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
I was using a way to check md5sum on a lot of file using
for myfile in `cat ${ALLFILES}`; do if [ -f /${myfile} ]; then md5sum
/$myfile $ALLFILES}.md5; fi; done
But this is slow, comparing with xargs md5sum way.
time (for myfile in
severity 10355 wishlist
tags 10355 + notabug wontfix moreinfo
thanks
Erik Auerswald wrote:
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
I was using a way to check md5sum on a lot of file using
for myfile in `cat ${ALLFILES}`; do if [ -f /${myfile} ]; then md5sum
/$myfile $ALLFILES}.md5; fi; done
...
You could
On 12/23/2011 01:45 PM, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
I was using a way to check md5sum on a lot of file using
for myfile in `cat ${ALLFILES}`; do if [ -f /${myfile} ]; then md5sum
/$myfile $ALLFILES}.md5; fi; done
But this is slow, comparing with xargs md5sum way.
time (for myfile in `cat
- Original Message -
From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
To: Gilles Espinasse g@free.fr; 10...@debbugs.gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: bug#10355: Add an option to {md5,sha*} to ignore directories
severity 10355 wishlist
tags 10355 + notabug wontfix
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
My original goal was to warn, for unknown file system types,
that the type is unknown (suggesting to report it), and that
tail -f is resorting to the use of polling.
Oh right, warn about unknown.
That would make sense.
Here's a proposed patch:
From
On 12/23/2011 06:11 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Here's a proposed patch:
Looks good, one nit.
--- a/src/extract-magic
+++ b/src/extract-magic
@@ -65,10 +65,15 @@ FIXME: describe
OPTIONS:
- Derive #define directives from specially formatted `case ...:' statements.
+ There are two modes
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/23/2011 06:11 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Here's a proposed patch:
Looks good, one nit.
--- a/src/extract-magic
+++ b/src/extract-magic
@@ -65,10 +65,15 @@ FIXME: describe
OPTIONS:
- Derive #define directives from specially formatted `case ...:' statements.
+
Jim Meyering wrote on 12/23/2011 07:11 PM:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
My original goal was to warn, for unknown file system types,
that the type is unknown (suggesting to report it), and that
tail -f is resorting to the use of polling.
Oh right, warn about unknown.
That would make sense.
Bob Proulx writes:
severity 10355 wishlist
tags 10355 + notabug wontfix moreinfo
thanks
Erik Auerswald wrote:
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
I was using a way to check md5sum on a lot of file using
for myfile in `cat ${ALLFILES}`; do if [ -f /${myfile} ]; then md5sum
/$myfile
Alan Curry wrote:
Do you suppose we can convince GNU grep's maintainer to follow this
philosphy?
Too late. GNU grep already has --recursive. I think adding
--recursive to grep was a mistake. It then requires most of 'find' to
be added to it too. (--include*, --exclude*)
$ mkdir d
$ touch
14 matches
Mail list logo
