On 06/02/2013 09:13 PM, Jordon Kalilich wrote:
The output mostly follows the ISO 8601:2004 extended format but fails to
include
a colon in the time zone offset, as required by section 4.3.2 Complete
representations and section 4.3.3 Representations other than complete.
If memory serves the
Thus spake Paul Eggert on 06/04/2013 12:10 AM:
At any rate, the --iso-8601 option has been deprecated since 2005.
Why is it deprecated? I don't recall seeing it in the man page until recently,
and I've noticed an increase in the use of ISO 8601 over the past few years.
This option seems like it
Paul Eggert wrote:
On 06/02/2013 09:13 PM, Jordon Kalilich wrote:
The output mostly follows the ISO 8601:2004 extended format but
fails to include
a colon in the time zone offset, as required by section 4.3.2 Complete
representations and section 4.3.3 Representations other than complete.
On 06/04/2013 09:55 AM, Jordon Kalilich wrote:
Thus spake Paul Eggert on 06/04/2013 12:10 AM:
At any rate, the --iso-8601 option has been deprecated since 2005.
Why is it deprecated? I don't recall seeing it in the man page until recently,
and I've noticed an increase in the use of ISO 8601
I have a file (named 'a')which contains following data.
;
8003
8004
8005
8010
9040
9041
9042
8336
8336
8337
8338
8338
8339
8340
8341
9000
9216
9217
9218
9219
9220
9221
9232
9233
9234
9248
9249
9250
9251
9264
9265
9280
9296
9281
9297
9001
9226
9040
9040
15008
9041
9042
15009
15010
6169
6170
18000
On 06/04/2013 01:07 PM, Shahid Hussain wrote:
I have a file (named 'a')which contains following data.
;
8003
8004
8005
8010
9040
9041
9042
8336
8336
8337
8338
8338
8339
8340
8341
9000
9216
9217
9218
9219
9220
9221
9232
9233
9234
9248
9249
9250
9251
9264
9265
9280
tag 14555 moreinfo
thanks
On 06/04/2013 06:07 AM, Shahid Hussain wrote:
I have a file (named 'a')which contains following data.
9041
9042
8336
...
9041
Ouch. Your file is not sorted. Therefore, 9041 is NOT unique when run
through 'uniq', which only compares adjacent lines.
And Below
On 06/04/2013 09:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
[adding the list back in the loop; also adding bug-coreutils to get a
bug number assigned for 2 doc bugs, and slightly reformatting to avoid
excessive top-posting]
On 06/04/2013 01:44 PM, smu johnson wrote:
I did reply on purpose to you, but only
Hi,
Appreciate your quick reply. What exactly i m doing is there are so many
files in my product which contains some data in name = value format. By
using some pattern i m extracting only value field from all files and
redirecting the output to one temporarily file as i do not want any value
to