Hi there,
I would like to see dd wrapper progress-dd into coreutils.
All it does is to keep sending USR1 to a child dd process to increase
usability of that dd feature.
It's up here:
http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=progress-dd.git;a=blob;f=progress-dd
I'm happy to fix any potential issues about it
On 08/12/14 14:29, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to see dd wrapper progress-dd into coreutils.
All it does is to keep sending USR1 to a child dd process to increase
usability of that dd feature.
It's up here:
Hello, Padraig -
How are you?
Can you explain the behavior of diff(1) shown below?
With -U1 and -U2 , the --ignore-matching-lines='Id' argument suppresses
display of the difference between the 'Id' lines, as expected.
But with -U3, the diff of the 'Id' lines reappears, in spite of the
On 12/08/2014 03:27 PM, Todd Shandelman wrote:
With -U1 and -U2 , the --ignore-matching-lines='Id' argument suppresses
display of the difference between the 'Id' lines, as expected.
At that (small) level of context, the hunk containing the 'Id' line is
separate from the remaining hunks, so the
Thanks.
Well, I must say that is all rather counter-intuitive.
I never dreamed that the amount of context I select would actually affect
the diff itself and how it is computed.
But if you say so, I guess that is how it works.
Todd
On 8 December 2014 at 16:46, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/08/2014 04:50 PM, Todd Shandelman wrote:
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
Thanks.
Well, I must say that is all rather counter-intuitive.
I never dreamed that the amount of context I select would actually affect
the diff itself and how it is computed.
The diff is computed the