On 4/30/22 05:48, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Yes, but to be clear, POSIX says:
shall be evaluated as if by the strtod() function if the
corresponding conversion specifier is a, A, e, E, f, F, g, or G
so the number should be regarded as a double-precision number
(type double).
Yes, but POSIX
On 2022-04-29 16:16:28 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 4/29/22 13:04, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > I think I'm going to stick with the behavior I proposed, fixing the POSIX
> > conformance issue and preserving backwards compatibility, until I hear more
> > about whether backwards compatibility is an issue
