On 23/03/2023 22:57, Paul Eggert wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
On 3/23/23 07:55, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps we should use the above __ANDROID__ logic in all cases,
so that we fallback unless there is a specific reason not to.
Yes, that sounds better.
+/* Whether the errno indicate
Thanks for looking into this.
On 3/23/23 07:55, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps we should use the above __ANDROID__ logic in all cases,
so that we fallback unless there is a specific reason not to.
Yes, that sounds better.
+/* Whether the errno indicates operation is a transient failure.
+ I
On 3/23/23 06:18, Edgar Aquino Rodriguez wrote:
if i run date
(system time)
Thu Mar 23 07:15:39 MST 2023
i dont now but if i run date --custom
Thu Mar 23 13:34:15 MST 2023
or how can get multiple timezones in the same system
Although it's not clear what you're asking for, but perhaps these
ex
On 23/03/2023 13:39, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 23/03/2023 13:03, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Details at
https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/issues/15706#issuecomment-1481144831
But in summary, the new --reflink errno checking in coreutils 9.2
is not working appropriately on android 4.9 kernels at
i had a question about date time on linux terminal, if is possible had
multiple times i mean
something like this
if i run date
(system time)
Thu Mar 23 07:15:39 MST 2023
i dont now but if i run date --custom
Thu Mar 23 13:34:15 MST 2023
or how can get multiple timezones in the same system
On 23/03/2023 13:03, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Details at
https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/issues/15706#issuecomment-1481144831
But in summary, the new --reflink errno checking in coreutils 9.2
is not working appropriately on android 4.9 kernels at least.
Proposed patch attached.
It may be
Details at
https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/issues/15706#issuecomment-1481144831
But in summary, the new --reflink errno checking in coreutils 9.2
is not working appropriately on android 4.9 kernels at least.
cheers,
Pádraig
On 23/03/2023 09:32, Moviuro via GNU coreutils Bug Reports wrote:
Hello,
This report was first found on r/archlinux:
% echo "123" > 1
% echo "1234" > 2
% echo "abc" > 3
% sha256sum 1 2 3 > sums.sha256
% sha1sum 1 2 3 > sums.sha1
% echo "123" > 2 # break file 2
% sha256sum -c sums.sha256 # retu
Hello,
This report was first found on r/archlinux:
% echo "123" > 1
% echo "1234" > 2
% echo "abc" > 3
% sha256sum 1 2 3 > sums.sha256
% sha1sum 1 2 3 > sums.sha1
% echo "123" > 2 # break file 2
% sha256sum -c sums.sha256 # returns 2: OK (incorrect)
% sha1sum -c sums.sha1 # returns 2: OK
% tail