bug#69532: mv's new -x option should be made orthogonal to -t/-T/default

2024-03-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 3/20/24 14:43, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 3/17/24 07:10, Paul Eggert wrote: > Now, extending "exchange" to more arguments is confusing and the > use is not intuitive: >mv -v --exchange a b c d It's also pointless. An atomic exchange on more than 2 files ISN'T ATOMIC. That's why I didn't

bug#69532: mv's new -x option should be made orthogonal to -t/-T/default

2024-03-04 Thread Rob Landley
On 3/4/24 18:43, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Adding Rob to the loop because this impacts compatibility with > toybox/maybe busybox implementations > (Quoting in full for convenience, there's a few more mails in > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2024-03/msg2.html > but we