[PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* bootstrap (get_version): Fix portability issues in sed script. (check_versions): For buildreq apps, honor the corresponding $APP variable like $TAR, $AUTOCONF. (usage): Document this. (update_po_files): Honor $SHA1SUM. (main): Honor $AUTOPOINT, $ACLOCAL, $AUTOCONF, $AUTOHEADER, $AUTOMAKE,

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: Hello Jim, I know bootstrap isn't meant to necessarily be portable. But it's just so much more comfortable to be able to use a git tree also on non-GNU systems, that e.g. have GNU tools installed with a 'g' program prefix (in this case,

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:09:10PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: There is one question I have on this: coreutils requires 'tar', my patch will allow $TAR as GNU tar. However, Automake's macros will honor $AMTAR only, not $TAR. Is this where tar

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Pádraig Brady
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * bootstrap (get_version): Fix portability issues in sed script. Hello Jim, I know bootstrap isn't meant to necessarily be portable. But it's just so much more comfortable to be able to use a git tree also on non-GNU systems, that e.g. have GNU tools installed with

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:52:46PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:09:10PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: There is one question I have on this: coreutils requires 'tar', my patch

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:52:46PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:09:10PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: There is one question I

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:09:10PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: There is one question I have on this: coreutils requires 'tar', my patch will allow $TAR as GNU tar. However, Automake's macros will

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 03:29:44PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: Hmm, ok, I understand the point. Well, up to you, that s/TAR/AMTAR/ change would be fine with me. Since it's your change, you do need to sign off on the incremental ;-) Yeah,

Re: [PATCH] more portable bootstrap procedure

2008-12-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 03:29:44PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: Hmm, ok, I understand the point. Well, up to you, that s/TAR/AMTAR/ change would be fine with me. Since it's your change, you do need