Len Umina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would suggest the following change:
Thanks for pointing out the wording problem, but the proposed change
is too much: it contains many details that may be true for your system
but are not true in general. For example, on some systems users other
than the
Nicenesses range
from -20 (most favorable scheduling) to 19 (least favorable).
--
This is very ambiguous since Niceness is a concept based on what the
user is trying to do and therefore has two potential, but reversed
scales for evaluation.
For example:
