Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerker Bäck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2004-03/msg00097.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00077.html
Is there a solution for this yet?
Some of the problems described in those
Last I heard, the following patch, mostly from Darren Starr, does the
job as long as you manually define MOUNTED_INTERIX (eventually, it'll
be defined via m4/ls-mntd-fs.m4).
You mean:
#define MOUNTED_INTERIX 1
in config.h?
Right.
Thanks, I've found it by browsing the cvs source (select
Jerker Bäck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last I heard, the following patch, mostly from Darren Starr, does the
job as long as you manually define MOUNTED_INTERIX (eventually, it'll
be defined via m4/ls-mntd-fs.m4).
You mean:
#define MOUNTED_INTERIX 1
in config.h?
Right.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2004-03/msg00097.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00077.html
Is there a solution for this yet?
I'm using the retail version of Interix 5.2 (2006-01-06) and get the same
problem in configure for coreutils-5.93. I
Jerker Bäck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2004-03/msg00097.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00077.html
Is there a solution for this yet?
Some of the problems described in those links have been fixed, in
coreutils CVS.
Sam Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evening all,
I'm having some trouble getting coreutils running under Interix
(Microsoft's POSIX subsystem aka Services for Unix which is to be
included in Windows 2003 Server R2, Vista, etc.). First I tell it
about the new release (5.2 instead of 3.x or
Sam Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evening all,
I'm having some trouble getting coreutils running under Interix
(Microsoft's POSIX subsystem aka Services for Unix which is to be
included in Windows 2003 Server R2, Vista, etc.). First I tell it
about the new release (5.2 instead of 3.x or
