On 07/27/14 19:11, Linda Walsh wrote:
It is more common to specify transfer sizes in SI and mean IEC if you
are in the US where the digital computer was created.
People in the US have not adopted SI units and many wouldn't know
a meter from a molehill, so SI units aren't the first thing that
Christian Groessler wrote:
On 07/27/14 19:11, Linda Walsh wrote:
It is more common to specify transfer sizes in SI and mean IEC if you
are in the US where the digital computer was created.
People in the US have not adopted SI units and many wouldn't know
a meter from a molehill, so SI units
Pádraig Brady wrote:
That was the original approach but is a bit worse than the dynamic approach
since it's common to specify transfer sizes in IEC units for SI sized data.
It is more common to specify transfer sizes in SI and mean IEC if you
are in the US where the digital computer was
On 07/26/2014 02:35 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Pádraig: you may have missed this as it was a reply to
an old thread, but, changing the subj and composing as new
should prevent that (I hope)
You were concerned that the user would get different outputs
based on the previously suggested
Pádraig: you may have missed this as it was a reply to
an old thread, but, changing the subj and composing as new
should prevent that (I hope)
You were concerned that the user would get different outputs
based on the previously suggested algorithm -- as well as
possibly different output when
