Pádraig Brady wrote:
Charles Rogers wrote:
Is it ever possible for the mv command ( without using the –u
option ) to leave the file(s) in the source directory, while also
copying to the destination directory?
...
Any comments appreciated!
Your description implies that your destination
of Renata Karciauskaite )
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:46 PM
To: Rogers, Charles (MAN-Corporate-CON); 20...@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20091: mv command
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Charles Rogers wrote:
Is it ever
Rogers, Charles (MAN-Corporate-CON) wrote:
Thank you all so much for the explanation. It is as you describe.
1. We had insufficient permissions on the source directory
2. The destination directory was indeed on a different file system
Ah! All is explained.
So, our question is
Is it ever possible for the mv command ( without using the -u option ) to
leave the file(s) in the source directory, while also copying to the
destination directory?
We were experiencing this under zsh and GNU/Linux
2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64.
Any comments appreciated!
thanks!
On 11/03/15 21:02, Rogers, Charles (MAN-Corporate-CON) wrote:
Is it ever possible for the mv command ( without using the –u option ) to
leave the file(s) in the source directory, while also copying to the
destination directory?
We were experiencing this under zsh and
