On 04/27/2015 09:27 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
Could we work around
it?
Sure, how about if we shrink it down to 0.19? Would that work for you?
yes, 0.19 is okay for me - openSUSE-13.2 has 0.19.2.
Thanks have a nice day,
Berny
On 04/27/2015 07:30 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
--- a/bootstrap.conf
+++ b/bootstrap.conf
...
@@ -318,9 +319,9 @@ gnulib_tool_option_extras=--tests-base=gnulib-tests
--with-tests --symlink\
buildreq=\
autoconf 2.64
automake 1.11.2
-autopoint -
+autopoint 0.19.4
bison -
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
Could we work around
it?
Sure, how about if we shrink it down to 0.19? Would that work for you?
I picked 0.19.4 only because the old value was too low for gnulib and I was at
0.19.4. I think it needs to be at least 0.19, because of the recent gnulib changes.
tag 20437 notabug
close 20437
stop
On 27/04/15 06:30, Paul Eggert wrote:
Currently GNU 'ls' dynamically links a whole bunch of libraries, libraries
like
libpcre and liblzma. Can we figure out some way to remove the runtime
dependencies on these libraries? It's better if a core utility
On 27/04/15 14:12, Pádraig Brady wrote:
tag 20437 notabug
close 20437
stop
On 27/04/15 06:30, Paul Eggert wrote:
Currently GNU 'ls' dynamically links a whole bunch of libraries, libraries
like
libpcre and liblzma. Can we figure out some way to remove the runtime
dependencies on these
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Further reductions in deps
might be possible by splitting up libselinux, allowing apps like ls
that just read contexts, to link with the appropriate lib.
I tried to see how to send a copy of this bug http://bugs.gnu.org/20437 to the
libselinux developers, but the
Currently GNU 'ls' dynamically links a whole bunch of libraries, libraries like
libpcre and liblzma. Can we figure out some way to remove the runtime
dependencies on these libraries? It's better if a core utility like 'ls' avoids
libthis and libthat unless the libraries are vital to its
