bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2018-10-25 Thread Assaf Gordon
tags 22624 fixed close 22624 stop (triaging old bugs) With fixes commited in: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=632eda520f7cf49d9d1662835c7c37e17033e128 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=62e7af0326786a7dec91d982238948eddab9d6af And no further

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-12 Thread Paul Eggert
On 02/11/2016 08:13 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: The changes look good, except for this: $ seq 1000 | split -n4 $ seq 10 | split -n4 split: -: cannot determine file size: Illegal seek I.E. it would be better to indicate immediately if there is an issue determining the file size,

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-12 Thread Paul Eggert
On 02/12/2016 06:25 AM, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: The effectively-zero load, and no CPU consumption, suggests that the "make check" run is in a wait state. Thanks for checking. I installed the attached patch to try to fix the test script so that it doesn't hang forever in this situation. The

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/02/16 10:18, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 02/11/2016 08:13 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> The changes look good, except for this: >> >>$ seq 1000 | split -n4 >>$ seq 10 | split -n4 >>split: -: cannot determine file size: Illegal seek >> >> I.E. it would be better to indicate

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-11 Thread Nelson H. F. Beebe
Thanks, Paul, for hurdtest.c and the subsequent tiny patch to it. Here is the test on my GNU/Hurd system on virt-manager + QEMU-KVM on top of CentOS 7: $ cc hurdtest.c && time ./a.out file=/dev/zero CHR st_size=9223372036854775807 st_blksize=8192 st_blocks=8 cur_offset=0

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-10 Thread Nelson H. F. Beebe
I'm pleased to report successful builds, validations, and installations of coreutils-8.25 on at least 72 of the 77 machines in our lab running various flavors of Unix. The one problematic system is GNU/Hurd, aka Debian GNU/Hurd stretch/sid. We ran Hurd on VMware/ESX for a couple of years, but it

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-10 Thread Paul Eggert
On 02/10/2016 01:57 PM, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: SKIP: tests/split/line-bytes.sh Timeout, server 192.168.122.66 not responding. I presume the test that crashes your system is tests/split/l-chunk.sh, which invokes commands like 'split -n l/10 /dev/null' and 'split -n 1/2

bug#22624: [bug-coreutils] coreutils-8.25: big success, but problem on GNU/Hurd

2016-02-10 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 10/02/16 13:57, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > I'm pleased to report successful builds, validations, and > installations of coreutils-8.25 on at least 72 of the 77 machines in > our lab running various flavors of Unix. Looks like were improving well in portability :) Many thanks for giving access