> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pwd --help
> bash: pwd: --: invalid option
> pwd: usage: pwd [-PL]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ which pwd
> /usr/local/bin/pwd
>
> Strange. Any idea what's going wrong?
Yes - which(1) is not required by POSIX, but it is a tcsh builtin that
corresponds to the POSIX-required
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:18:05PM +0530, G. Vamsee Krishna wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/local/bin/pwd --help
> Usage: /usr/local/bin/pwd [OPTION]
> Print the full filename of the current working directory.
>
> --help display this help and exit
> --version output version i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Philip Rowlands on 4/8/2005 2:14 AM:
> built-in pwd implementations can be confusing as they will in some
> circumstances return a different directory to /bin/pwd, if you have cd'd
> through a symlink. e.g.
>
> $ mkdir a && ln -s a b
> $
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, r3b3l wrote:
>
> Hi! I would like to know if this i encountered is really a bug or i'm i
> just doing something wrong? i'm kind off a newbie with linux, so sory if
> i ask some silly question or if i am just doing it all wrong.
> I am running mandrake linux 10.1 and the pwd
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, r3b3l wrote:
>Hi! I would like to know if this i encountered is really a bug or i'm i
>just doing something wrong? i'm kind off a newbie with linux, so sory
>if i ask some silly question or if i am just doing it all wrong. I am
>running mandrake linux 10.1 and the pwd --version
logo
Comunicação urgente - Comunicação confidencial
Hi! I would like to know if this i encountered is really a bug or i'm i
just doing something wrong? i'm kind off a newbie with linux, so sory if
i ask some silly question or if i am just doing it all wrong.
I am running mandrake linux 10.1 and t
