On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:02 AM, James Youngmanj...@gnu.org wrote:
[+bug-findutils]
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, PGpgscoo...@gmail.com wrote:
ah, great!
thank you for the info. That helps me understand a lot. Now I see why find
fails. And perhaps it's not worth the extra computation time
[+bug-findutils]
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, PGpgscoo...@gmail.com wrote:
ah, great!
thank you for the info. That helps me understand a lot. Now I see why find
fails. And perhaps it's not worth the extra computation time required to,
upon failure of cd'ing into the directory, trying to
Dear coreutils,
Actually, I'm not sure if ls is the perpetrator, but maybe you guys can find
out where things go wrong. I do not think that the filename canttouchthis
should be listed when I am not root in the following situation:
r...@system76-pc:/home/xinwei/bugreport# ls -l
total 4
d---r--r--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to PG on 7/6/2009 11:21 PM:
Dear coreutils,
Actually, I'm not sure if ls is the perpetrator, but maybe you guys can find
out where things go wrong. I do not think that the filename canttouchthis
should be listed when I am not root in
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, PG wrote:
r...@system76-pc:/home/xinwei/bugreport# ls -l
total 4
d---r--r-- 2 root root 4096 2009-07-05 13:27 protected
xin...@system76-pc:~/bugreport$ ls -l protected/
ls: cannot access protected/canttouchthis: Permission denied
total 0
-? ? ? ? ?
ah, great!
thank you for the info. That helps me understand a lot. Now I see why find
fails. And perhaps it's not worth the extra computation time required to,
upon failure of cd'ing into the directory, trying to list it.
I still think there should be an option for find that one could turn on