Re: df reporting problem with raid

2006-09-09 Thread Steven Fishback
Philip Rowlands wrote: What are the values returned by the statfs system call? Try running this command $ strace -e trace=statfs,statfs64 df /dev/null and seeing what values are given for f_blocks, f_bfree and f_bavail. Cheers, Phil # strace -e trace=statfs,statfs64 df /dev/null

Re: df reporting problem with raid

2006-09-09 Thread Jim Meyering
Steven Fishback [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently setup raid 1 disks on my Linux OS. The other 300+ kickstart nodes are exactly the same minus the raid setup and are working fine. So I'm only guessing the raid setup has df reporting incorrectly for the nfs mounts??? I'm using RHEL 3.0AS

df reporting problem with raid

2006-09-08 Thread Steven Fishback
I recently setup raid 1 disks on my Linux OS. The other 300+ kickstart nodes are exactly the same minus the raid setup and are working fine. So I'm only guessing the raid setup has df reporting incorrectly for the nfs mounts??? I'm using RHEL 3.0AS 2.4.21-4.ELsmp df is from coreutils-4.5.3-26

Re: df reporting problem with raid

2006-09-08 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Steven Fishback wrote: [snip] # df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md1 4.8G 3.2G 1.3G 72% / /dev/md0 46M 22M 23M 49% /boot none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm /dev/md4 25G 72K