enhancement bug for ls...

2007-02-22 Thread Rajeswar
Hi All, Currently IF you want to list only the directories ( as a ls command ) or only interested in the directory structure ( tree ), There is no option in ls. ls has to be enhanced with some e flag so that the following scenarios are supported. 1. This listing has to be based on file

Re: enhancement bug for ls...

2007-02-22 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Rajeswar wrote: Currently IF you want to list only the directories ( as a ls command ) or only interested in the directory structure ( tree ), There is no option in ls. ls has to be enhanced with some e flag so that the following scenarios are supported. 1. This

Re: enhancement bug for ls...

2007-02-22 Thread James Youngman
On 2/21/07, Rajeswar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Currently IF you want to list only the directories ( as a ls command ) or only interested in the directory structure ( tree ), [...] This has been a requirement for a very long time but still not attended for the past 30 years. That's

Re: enhancement bug for ls...

2007-02-22 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
That's probably because you can do all these things with find(1). In any case it's very unlikely that any more single-letter options will be added to the coreutils ls because of the likelihood of some conflict with other ls implementations. Not to mention that all single-letter