Re: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-20 Thread James Youngman
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Chris Weston wrote: I'm trying debug an issue with my one of my disks in my system. I have an ext3 file system mounted and ls -l is reporting an impossible size for two of the files:

Re: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-20 Thread Andreas Schwab
Chris Weston wwes...@redback.com writes: Yes, the platform is MIPS with a 64-bit Kernel and 32-bit userland. Looks like your ls is an n32 binary, but your strace can only decode o32 traces. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3

Re: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-20 Thread Matthew Woehlke
James Youngman wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@elided wrote: Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. Chris Weston wrote: I'm trying debug an issue with my one of my disks in my system. I have an ext3 file system mounted and ls

RE: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-20 Thread Chris Weston
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:37 AM James Youngman j...@gnu.org wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Chris Weston wrote: I'm trying debug an issue with my one of my disks in my system. I have an ext3 file system mounted and ls -l is

RE: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-19 Thread Chris Weston
Hi, The version of GNU coreutils is 6.9. Please see the capture from 'stat' and strace -v ls -l' below. Thanks, Chris r...@localhost:/mnt/sys/external stat log_1848_1239927341.core File: `log_1848_1239927341.core' Size: 109775240942714880 Blocks: 336IO Block: 4096 regular

Re: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 13:05:31 Chris Weston wrote: r...@localhost:/mnt/sys/external strace -v ls -l log_1848_1239927341.core svr4_syscall() = 0 this strace is pretty much garbage from what i can see. i havent the foggiest why it would be so utterly broken, sorry.

ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-18 Thread Chris Weston
Hi, I'm trying debug an issue with my one of my disks in my system. I have an ext3 file system mounted and ls -l is reporting an impossible size for two of the files: log_1848_1239927341.core and log_1848_1239927341.core~. The size is 98P. This partition (/dev/sdb2) is only a few GB in size. I

Re: ls reports incorrect file size compared to what debugfs reports for ext3 filesystem

2009-05-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 18 May 2009 20:56:05 Chris Weston wrote: I'm trying debug an issue with my one of my disks in my system. I have an ext3 file system mounted and ls -l is reporting an impossible size for two of the files: log_1848_1239927341.core and log_1848_1239927341.core~. The size is 98P. This