Reuben Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a suggestion that would be a lot simpler to implement: have pwd
implement -P as a no-op, and document the lack of -L, and the conflict
with the POSIX default behaviour. I'd be happy to write a
documentation patch.
That will enlighten users; if
These two switches are necessary for POSIX compatibility. I note that bash's
pwd does support them; is the intention that bash's built-in pwd, which
does, should fill this gap in a GNU system?
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur (Anon)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Reuben Thomas on 10/22/2008 6:08 AM:
These two switches are necessary for POSIX compatibility. I note that
bash's pwd does support them; is the intention that bash's built-in pwd,
which does, should fill this gap in a GNU system?
It
Here's a suggestion that would be a lot simpler to implement: have pwd
implement -P as a no-op, and document the lack of -L, and the conflict with
the POSIX default behaviour. I'd be happy to write a documentation patch.
That will enlighten users; if anyone cares enough about coreutils's pwd
