On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 16:25 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
...
ntfs-3g correctly returns ENOTEMPTY but this information gets lost and
arrives as success to gnu rm.
This indeed looks to be a problem in Solaris.
Yup, I agree. Solaris rm(1) has the correct behaviour but using the GNU
rm
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat
doesn't work as documented. That unlinkat call
Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net writes:
Andras Barna andras.barna at gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net wrote:
...
That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat
doesn't work as documented. That unlinkat call is succeeding,
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat
doesn't
Szabolcs Szakacsits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net writes:
Andras Barna andras.barna at gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering jim at meyering.net
wrote:
...
That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat
doesn't work as
Hi Solaris FUSE Developers,
We're back with the GNU rm -rf failing with ntfs-3g on Solaris only.
GNU rm on Linux is ok with ntfs-3g. Solaris rm is also ok with ntfs-3g
but it works differently.
To reproduce the problem:
1. compile the latest coreutils, version 6.12
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote:
when I execute rm (6.12) -r directory:
unique: 202, opcode: ACCESS (34), nodeid: 1, insize: 48
ACCESS / 011
unique: 202, error: -89 (Operation not applicable), outsize: 16
unique: 203, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 1, insize: 42
LOOKUP /o
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/
@osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm --version|head -1
rm (GNU coreutils) 6.12
@osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm -rf t
@osol /ntfs: echo $?
0
@osol /ntfs: ls t
t
@osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm -r t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/
@osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm --version|head -1
rm (GNU coreutils) 6.12
@osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm -rf t
@osol
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote:
on opensolaris (update 94) can't remove recursively directories.
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/rm --version|head -1
rm (GNU coreutils) 6.7
@osol /ntfs: rm -rf t
rm: cannot remove
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Philip Rowlands [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote:
on opensolaris (update 94) can't remove recursively directories.
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/
@osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/rm
11 matches
Mail list logo
