Kevin Scannell wrote:
Wanderer, could you tell me what version of glibc you have? Here's mine:
ii libc6-dev 2.4-1ubuntu12 GNU C Library: Development Libraries
and Hea
ii libc6-dev 2.3.6.ds1-9GNU C Library: Development Libraries
and Heade
Apparently Ubuntu is more
Kevin Scannell wrote on 24-01-07 02:50:
I suspect that the behavior I describe below is caused by broken
locale definition files, but I wanted to get an expert opinion on this
before I go trying to find who maintains those upstream.
I know about the sort does not sort FAQ, and I don't think
On 1/24/07, Bauke Jan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My advice is to first also do sort --version on the latter machine.
That might be a lead.
I'm sorry for leaving that out. The second machine was running
coreutils-5.96, same as the first one. More significantly, the sort
order that it
Kevin Scannell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone with a Debian-like distribution reproduce the strange sort
order I'm seeing?
a
á
áa
aá
az
áz
áa
aá
I can't, with Debian stable x86. I get the order you expect.
$ /usr/bin/sort test.txt
a
á
aá
áa
az
áz
On 1/24/07, The Wanderer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Kevin Scannell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone with a Debian-like distribution reproduce the strange
sort order I'm seeing?
a
á
áa
aá
az
áz
áa
aá
I can't, with Debian stable x86. I get the order you
I suspect that the behavior I describe below is caused by broken
locale definition files, but I wanted to get an expert opinion on this
before I go trying to find who maintains those upstream.
I know about the sort does not sort FAQ, and I don't think that I've
fallen into that trap, so please
