Re: md5sum fails on DOS formatted files

2006-08-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 8/13/2006 4:36 PM: Problem: The check with md5sum failed (No such file or directory/FAILED open or read) if the text file with the checksum included DOS(PC) formatted. Yes, this is an issue for md5sum, as well as

coreutils-6.0 released

2006-08-15 Thread Jim Meyering
Coreutils version 6.0 has been released. If you haven't heard about the GNU coreutils, the FAQ is a good place to start: http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/ Coreutils development branched after the stable 5.92 release. Since then, there have been five releases from the stable branch: 5.93

hu.po ngettext fixes

2006-08-15 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi, Please apply the first attached patch. It fixes the following incorrect ngettext usage in hu.po: As the header of hu.po correctly states, as well as mentioned in glibc's info pages, Hungarian has only one msgstr form, we use the singular form of a noun if it is preceded by a number.

FYI: openat, fchmodat, mkdirat logic factored out...

2006-08-15 Thread Jim Meyering
Three of the functions in openat.c, plus those in fchmodat.c and mkdirat.c all used the same logic. This change factors that into a new file, at-func.c, which is then included by each of those three: lib/ChangeLog | 13 +++ lib/at-func.c | 75

coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Keith Thompson
% uname -a SunOS elmak 5.9 Generic_118558-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris % config.guess sparc-sun-solaris2.9 % gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 [...] The build fails with the following error message: gai_strerror.c:70: error: conflicting types for 'gai_strerror'

Re: hu.po ngettext fixes

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Egmont Koblinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please apply the first attached patch. Can you please forward that patch to the Translation Project? We would like to rely on them to put a proper translation into http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/teams/PO/hu/, and we will pick it up from

coreutils 6.0, cygwin build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Eric Blake
On cygwin: if gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -I../lib -I../lib - I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -MT stat.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/stat.Tpo -c -o stat.o stat.c; \ then mv -f .deps/stat.Tpo .deps/stat.Po; else rm - f .deps/stat.Tpo; exit 1; fi stat.c: In function

Re: coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Keith Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: % uname -a SunOS elmak 5.9 Generic_118558-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris % config.guess sparc-sun-solaris2.9 % gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 [...] The build fails with the following error message: gai_strerror.c:70: error:

Re: coreutils 6.0, cygwin build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've known about it and patched it in my local tree since April, but my patch in savannah was unfortunately never applied: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=16325 Thanks for mentioning that. I don't fully understand the issues here

Re: coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Keith Thompson
On Tue 06-08-15 15:30, Paul Eggert wrote: Keith Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: % uname -a SunOS elmak 5.9 Generic_118558-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris % config.guess sparc-sun-solaris2.9 % gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 [...] The build fails with the following

df / no longer outputs a header

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
One thing we noticed right away when putting coreutils 6.0 in a place where others could use it is that df /usr no longer outputs a header. This change isn't intended, surely. While fixing this I noticed that the new behavior of exiting with nonzero status when ther's no output isn't documented.

Re: coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Keith Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's also a gcc 4.1.1 on the system. I'll try again with that. Thanks. You might also want to try with /opt/sfw/bin/gcc. (It's GCC 2.95.3, which should be entertaining. :-) ___ Bug-coreutils mailing

Re: coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Keith Thompson
On Tue 06-08-15 16:50, Paul Eggert wrote: Keith Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's also a gcc 4.1.1 on the system. I'll try again with that. Thanks. I got the same error with gcc 4.1.1. You might also want to try with /opt/sfw/bin/gcc. (It's GCC 2.95.3, which should be

Re: coreutils 6.0, Solaris 9 build failure

2006-08-15 Thread Keith Thompson
I've also run into a build problem on Solaris 7; details to follow. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ghoti.net/~kst San Diego Supercomputer Center * http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

coreutils fails on check for mv: FAIL: no-target-dir

2006-08-15 Thread Jared Martin
Per the instructions delivered by make check after building coreutils, I am including the following long log report. I am using a 64-bit Linux box running a corporate version of RedHat Linux: $ uname -a Linux houbtc-n-d99966 2.4.21-32.0.1.nfswan2 #1 SMP Thu Aug 4 11:02:01 CEST 2005 x86_64

Re: coreutils fails on check for mv: FAIL: no-target-dir

2006-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks for the bug report. What is the output of the following Bourne shell commands? This will give us a bit more information about the failure. cd tests/mv VERBOSE=yes make TESTS=no-target-dir check Also, what is the output of the following? cd tests/mv rm -fr d empty mkdir