Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since 10.95 is exactly halfway between 10.9
> and 11.0 both representations are equally valid, depending on the
> precision of the underlying floating point format.
Thanks for reporting this. Jim worked around the problem by changing
the test to speci
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this. Jim worked around the problem by changing
> the test to specify 10.94, but I think it's nicer to fix 'seq' instead
> to do the right thing with cases like this. While fixing this bug I
> noticed and fixed another one, with %% in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 11/3/2007 5:01 AM:
> $ cat --version|head -1 cat (GNU coreutils) 6.9-375-3e3f8
> $ cat --version|sed s/-/./|head -1 cat (GNU coreutils) 6.9.375-3e3f8
> $ cat --version|sed s/-/./g|head -1 cat (GNU core
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 11/3/2007 5:01 AM:
>> $ cat --version|head -1 cat (GNU coreutils) 6.9-375-3e3f8
>> $ cat --version|sed s/-/./|head -1 cat (GNU coreutils) 6.9.375-3e3f8
>> $ cat --version|sed s/-/./g|head -1 cat (GNU coreuti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 11/1/2007 5:21 PM:
> 3.5M http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-375-3e3f8.tar.lzma
> Thanks to everyone who's given feedback.
I haven't had time to fully analyze these failures on cygwin, but here's
the list. The bulk of
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 11/1/2007 5:21 PM:
>> 3.5M http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-375-3e3f8.tar.lzma
>> Thanks to everyone who's given feedback.
>
> I haven't had time to fully analyze these failures on cygwin, but here's
> the list. The bulk of
Hello,
I installed Niblex on a usb pen (Transcen Jetflash 16Go). It follow the
howto, but it doesn't work (The Grub stage 2 was unable to load).
But now, I can't access to the key and parted is unable to find the main
partition. There are just 512b which are visible.
On Ubuntu forum
http://forum.
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Where do you think it is buggy? This is the classical effect of double
>> rounding, and the printf formatting is doing exactly the right thing.
>
> Yes you are right.
> I misread my own test (again).
Actually I did not misread it. I added those tes
