On 12/30/2013 02:17 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
However, although -x is indeed a common option of several
programs, we are reluctant to add new short options.
I'd only consider doing so for compatibility reasons
I'm looking at compatibility reasons with
coreutil
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
* These coreutils programs have a --one-file-system option:
cp du rm
-
Guess I got a bit carried away.
On the above list with --one-file-system, only 'rm'
is missing -x as a shorthand for it.
I don't know that either BSD or Solaris have a
one-file-system
coreutils-8.22 build with clang-3.4 doesn't copy permissions correctly:
markus@x4 tmp % touch test1
markus@x4 tmp % chmod 600 test1
markus@x4 tmp % ls -al test1
-rw--- 1 markus markus 0 Dec 30 13:25 test1
markus@x4 tmp % /var/tmp/coreutils-8.22/src/cp test1 test2
markus@x4 tmp % ls -al test2
On 12/30/2013 12:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
coreutils-8.22 build with clang-3.4 doesn't copy permissions correctly:
markus@x4 tmp % touch test1
markus@x4 tmp % chmod 600 test1
markus@x4 tmp % ls -al test1
-rw--- 1 markus markus 0 Dec 30 13:25 test1
markus@x4 tmp %
Hello Paul,
Thank you.
I opened a GCC case based on your reply and it was accepted as compiler bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Best wishes,
David.
2013/12/27 Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu:
David Kredba wrote:
Can this be Coreutils issue? Or should I go to GCC?
On 2013.12.30 at 18:47 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/30/2013 12:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
coreutils-8.22 build with clang-3.4 doesn't copy permissions correctly:
markus@x4 tmp % touch test1
markus@x4 tmp % chmod 600 test1
markus@x4 tmp % ls -al test1
-rw--- 1 markus
