On 02/03/15 21:29, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
As root:
# cd /proc
# find -H [^0-9]* -name self -prune -o -name thread-self -prune -o -type f !
-name kmsg ! -name kcore ! -name kpagecount ! -name kpageflags -print0|wc -c
--files0-from=- |sort -n
Thanks for the report.
Jim Meyering wrote:
As root:
# cd /proc
# find -H [^0-9]* -name self -prune -o -name thread-self -prune -o -type f !
-name kmsg ! -name kcore ! -name kpagecount ! -name kpageflags -print0|wc -c
--files0-from=- |sort -n
Thanks for the report.
However, with wc from coreutils-8.23 and a 3.10
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Linda Walsh coreut...@tlinx.org wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
As root:
# cd /proc
# find -H [^0-9]* -name self -prune -o -name thread-self -prune -o -type
f !
-name kmsg ! -name kcore ! -name kpagecount ! -name kpageflags -print0|wc
-c
--files0-from=- |sort
On 02/28/2015 01:59 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
(coreutils-8.21-7.7.7)
wc -c(bytes) doesn't seem to reliably read the number
of bytes in a file.
I was wanting to find out what the largest data-source
files in '/proc' and '/sys' (didn't get around to trying
/sys, since all the files under
On 02 Mar 2015 06:57, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/28/2015 01:59 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
(coreutils-8.21-7.7.7)
wc -c(bytes) doesn't seem to reliably read the number
of bytes in a file.
I was wanting to find out what the largest data-source
files in '/proc' and '/sys' (didn't get around
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Linda Walsh coreut...@tlinx.org wrote:
(coreutils-8.21-7.7.7)
wc -c(bytes) doesn't seem to reliably read the number
of bytes in a file.
I was wanting to find out what the largest data-source
files in '/proc' and '/sys' (didn't get around to trying
/sys,
