Re: proposed pathchk change, in response to today's POSIX interpretation

2005-01-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know it's a pain, but would you please add a few tests to go with these changes? OK, done. Also, I fixed the code, documentation, and tests to align with another POSIX interpretation issued the same day, which I missed, which said that pathchk -P ''

Re: Test Failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on SunOS-5.5.1

2005-01-10 Thread Jim Meyering
Vin Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To whom it may concern: Thanks for the quick testing and report! What compiler did you use? On a SunOS-5.5.1 system (uname -a reports: SunOS boise 5.5.1 Generic_103640-40 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Solaris) I'm getting the following test failures:

Re: Test Failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on SunOS-5.5.1

2005-01-10 Thread Vin Shelton
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Vin Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To whom it may concern: Thanks for the quick testing and report! What compiler did you use? On a SunOS-5.5.1 system (uname -a reports: SunOS boise 5.5.1 Generic_103640-40 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Solaris) I'm