RE: Regarding the recover of the contents of the file that is removed using rm

Dear Sir or Madam Thanks for information given to me. Regards, Ram -Original Message- From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 1:16 PM To: ASP-TRN Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: Regarding the recover of the contents of the file that is removed

RE: Regarding the recover of the contents of the file that is removed using rm

Dear Sir or Madam Thanks for the information given to me. Regards, Ram -Original Message- From: James Youngman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:20 PM To: ASP-TRN Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: Regarding the recover of the contents of the file that

Test fails on darwin

Hi, I am trying to install coreutils-5.3.0 on my PowerBook. I am running MacOSX 10.3.8 (Darwin Kernel Version 7.8.0). The compilation goes well, but one of the test fails with the following message: make check [...] Making check in misc make check-TESTS ./tac-continue: FULL_PARTITION_TMPDIR

Re: Test fails on darwin

Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to install coreutils-5.3.0 on my PowerBook. I am running MacOSX 10.3.8 (Darwin Kernel Version 7.8.0). The compilation goes well, but one of the test fails with the following message: make check [...] ... FAIL: nice PASS: pathchk1

RE: fix for inefficient merges in sort.c

Hi Paul, thanks for the good words! That's an elegant solution - starting probe at 1 instead of in the middle, to get the case where the key we want is already in the first file. I like it. I had set up a test on my machine to try lots of different scenarios with the original sort.c and my