Chikaod Anyikire wrote:
> I am trying to use the install command for OpenNMS. The instructions say
> use the two options: -i and -u, but they are not available in with this
> command. The command is showed like this:
> install -disU. For some reason I have not be able to get any results, so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Berry wrote:
> GNU getopt tries to do too much when it reorders the commandline and
> therefor needs the "+" as a workaround.
>
>I don't suppose it matters at this point, but I fail to see the
>connection here. You can tell GNU getopt to REQUIRE_
The MS-Windows way of globbing is described at MSDN:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/vclang/html/_pluslang_Parsing_C.2b2b_.Command.2d.Line_Arguments.asp
From this description it seems that your example should work; also native
commands, such as dir, do expand the * when inside quotes. So p
As I read the documentation for gnu date it should parse iso-8601
dates correctly:
File: coreutils.info, Node: General date syntax
.
.
.
The output of `date' is not always acceptable as a date string, not
only because of the language problem, but also because there is no
Hi,
I am trying to use the install command for OpenNMS. The instructions say
use the two options: -i and -u, but they are not available in with this
command. The command is showed like this:
install -disU. For some reason I have not be able to get any results, so I
am helping you can help wit
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Revised patch attached.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks; I installed the following slightly-different patch.
>
>
Works for me. Thanks Paul.
Derek
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreut
GNU getopt tries to do too much when it reorders the commandline and
therefor needs the "+" as a workaround.
I don't suppose it matters at this point, but I fail to see the
connection here. You can tell GNU getopt to REQUIRE_ORDER instead of
PERMUTE without using +, either directly or set
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Revised patch attached.
Thanks; I installed the following slightly-different patch.
2005-05-10 Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* getopt.m4 (gl_GETOPT): Check for Solaris 10 bug, not decl, when
possible.
--- getopt.m4 6 May 2005 01:0
Derek Price writes:
>
> Okay, looking at that in C89 now, but just out of curiosity, if argv
> needs to be NULL terminated, what's the point of argc?
I believe it was added for convenience back in the dark ages. All the
Unix exec functions require a null-terminated argument list (and don't
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Kurz wrote:
>I'm running out of time. I have to quit. Thanks very much for your effords.
>When there is something to test, i'll still try to help.
No problem. Thanks for your help, Matthias.
Regards,
Derek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>>+ myargv[[0]] = "conftest";
>>+ myargv[[1]] = "-+";
>>
>>
>
>This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
>
>
Okay, looking at that in C89 now, but just out of curiosity, if argv
needs to be NULL terminated, what
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>>+ myargv[[0]] = "conftest";
>>+ myargv[[1]] = "-+";
>>
>>
>
>This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
>
>But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
>assuming Solaris 11 getopt might g
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Adam Price on 5/9/2005 11:39 PM:
>> Making check in touch
>> make check-TESTS
>> PASS: relative
>> 0a1
>>> touch: setting times of `/': Permission denied
>> FAIL: not-owner
>
> I've noticed that cygwin also tends to fail this test, because the t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Adam Price on 5/9/2005 11:39 PM:
> Making check in touch
> make check-TESTS
> PASS: relative
> 0a1
>> touch: setting times of `/': Permission denied
> FAIL: not-owner
I've noticed that cygwin also tends to fail this test, because the typ
James Youngman wrote:
> Paul> +static int
> Paul> +fts_compar (void const *a, void const *b)
> Paul> +{
> Paul>/* ... */
> Paul> + return pa[0]->fts_fts->fts_compar (pa, pb);
> Paul> +}
> ... compilers are likely to be able to inline the actual
> subroutine call away in any case.
How should t
On Tue, May 10, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
[...]
> > But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
> > assuming Solaris 11 getopt might get fixed? But even in that case,
> > the current code will work, right, since it will use
I am running macosx 10.4 with newly installed xcode tools. Make
check failed. I am providing the first ~20 lines of config.log and
the last ~50 lines of the output of 'make check.' Let me know if you
want any other information. (I ran make install and everything seems
to be working fine
On Mon, May 09, 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > + myargv[[0]] = "conftest";
> > + myargv[[1]] = "-+";
>
> This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
D'oh !
> But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're
> assuming S
Vlada Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still believe there is a bug in `mv'. Try to run
>
> mv --interactive --reply=no plain1 plain2
>
> and given both plains exist, plain2 gets overwritten. This is not
> expected behavior, not just by me (there is a Debian bug filled in).
> Command `cp' i
19 matches
Mail list logo
