[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
On what systems is env located in /bin/env? The normal location is in
/usr/bin/env.
POSIX doesn't specify the location for env, so either location conforms
to POSIX. On Solaris 10, the standard location is /usr/xpg4/bin/env.
(/usr/bin/env doesn't
If I crick doing env hacking, are you able to create a new command?
You are free to hack env, since it is open source, and you are free to
write your own commands. However, it is very doubtful that coreutils
will ever include your hacks, or adopt your proposed 'exe' utility, since
no one else
it seems that on os x, split can only make files as big as 600 megs or
so. here is the command i am using:
split -b4700m myFile.tar.gz myFile.tar.gz_ ;
Which should be about DVD sized chunks. But the files come out a
little over 600 megs each.
thanks
john
John Joseph Bachir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
split -b4700m myFile.tar.gz myFile.tar.gz_ ;
Which should be about DVD sized chunks. But the files come out a
little over 600 megs each.
Perhaps you're running an old version of split? split --version
should tell you. If it's before version
Theodoros V. Kalamatianos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, The Wanderer wrote:
Entering 'info mv' brings up an info interface to the exact same
page, including the same suggestion at the bottom. This is probably
more a Debian issue than a coreutils one, though.
I think it has
Ideally, info would be fixed to allow an exact-match, rather than
the current, first-match approach.
Or better yet, extending --show-options so you can pass a program to
it. Say, info --show-options pr coreutils.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
On 1/2/06, Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you're running an old version of split? split --version
should tell you. If it's before version 5.0.1 you need to upgrade, to
fix that bug. The current version is 5.93.
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.93.tar.gz
$ split
I have run this script on my linux router and in cygwin.
In both cases, the date is changed from 2006 to 2005.
---
set Time_Stamp=01-Jan-2006 21:22:23
echo $Time_Stamp
set MyDate=`date --date=$Time_Stamp +%G-%m-%d %T %a`
echo $MyDate
---
The problem disappears on January 2.
* John Joseph Bachir ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
it seems that on os x, split can only make files as big as 600 megs or
so. here is the command i am using:
split -b4700m myFile.tar.gz myFile.tar.gz_ ;
Which should be about DVD sized chunks. But the files come out a
little over 600 megs
Hi,
I've noticed that there is a change in behaviour where in recent
CVS, date -d will not accept a second count of 60 - i.e.
date -d Sat Dec 31 23:59:60 UTC 2005
gives 'invalid date' - where as the older 5.2.1 accepts it
(and gives midnight Jan 1).
Now as I understand it the Unix time can't
Coreutils:
After compiling the coreutils, I looked in the coreutils-5.93/src directory,
and noticed and executable named [ doing an ls -l \[ gave me...
-rwxr-xr-x 1 bbeck bbeck 73120 2006-01-02 16:03 [
when I tried running the file it output...
./[: missing `]'
on a whim I ran the program
Brian Beck wrote:
After compiling the coreutils, I looked in the coreutils-5.93/src directory,
and noticed and executable named [ doing an ls -l \[ gave me...
-rwxr-xr-x 1 bbeck bbeck 73120 2006-01-02 16:03 [
Yes. That is normal and good.
when I tried running the file it output...
I was wondering if that [ program is supposed to be there, or if
it's a typo. If I run info [ I get the info page for test, so I
wasn't certain if they were related.
They are the same, [ is for systems that don't have [ builtin into the
shell. Consider the following shell expresion:
Except that '[' is a built-in with most shells today. But for
older shells it was an external command.
I think it is important to note that GNU [ supports more fancy things
than the default GNU bash builtin; or atleast, used too...
___
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, William Johnson wrote:
I have run this script on my linux router and in cygwin.
In both cases, the date is changed from 2006 to 2005.
---
set Time_Stamp=01-Jan-2006 21:22:23
echo $Time_Stamp
set MyDate=`date --date=$Time_Stamp +%G-%m-%d %T %a`
echo $MyDate
---
The
William Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have run this script on my linux router and in cygwin.
In both cases, the date is changed from 2006 to 2005.
The output is correct. %G corresponds to %V, and so Sunday January 1
is considered to be in the previous year (2005, in this case).
You
Following up on my own email
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-01/msg6.html
it appears that an lchown-based approach doesn't work as I'd hoped,
because fts doesn't easily tell me whether the file we're visiting is
actually a symlink. However, I can fix the bug reported in
17 matches
Mail list logo
