Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should yesno() be setting the properties of stdin to be unbuffered for the
duration of the getline(), so that the rest of stdin is not consumed too
early?
That would make the code less portable/reliable, I think, and would
slow things down. POSIX does not
du (coreutils) 5.2.1
# du /home/reind --exclude=/home/reind
# du /home/reind -X exclude.txt
with exclude.txt:
/home/reind
Both of the above do not work as they should. They do not exclude the
above directories.
Sincerely,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 2/17/2006 9:14 AM:
No. Those who want `short' can use -I.
Although --ask-once does sound nice, I want to keep things minimal,
in case we end up providing similar functionality for other commands,
where adding a long-named
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 2/20/2006 6:06 AM:
ChangeLog:
2006-02-18 Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* TODO (rm): Implement rm -I.
* NEWS: Document it, along with change to rm --interactive.
Thanks. Applied.
I missed one spot of
du (coreutils) 5.2.1
The latest stable version of coreutils is 5.94 - consider
upgrading: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-02/msg00078.html
# du /home/reind --exclude=/home/reind
# du /home/reind -X exclude.txt
with exclude.txt:
/home/reind
Both of the above do
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 2/18/2006 12:44 AM:
Nicolas François [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I've found some other similar issues in install.c, join.c, pr.c, and uniq.c
I'm attaching a patch for Makefile.maint
Thanks again!
I switched it to use grep's
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I missed one spot of documentation, and introduced a typo. Please apply
this followon patch:
ChangeLog:
2006-02-20 Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* man/rm.x: Update documentation to match previous patch.
doc/ChangeLog:
2006-02-20 Eric Blake
Hi,
I want to compare a variable holding *string* with the *regular
expression *. Is it possible to do in unix with a single command?
Can we use test command in UNIX to compare a *string *with the
*regular expression*? if so please provide an example for that.
This sort of question
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, P Kensche wrote:
I use 4.5.3 from coreutils 5.93 and have a problem with sort.
This is a common issue, due to certain locale settings which influence
sorting behaviour. Please see:
Hello,
I use 4.5.3 from coreutils 5.93 and have a problem with sort.
File a:
a-1 1
a 0
is sorted by sort -k 1 a to
a 0
a-1 1
In contrast file b:
a a B
a-1 b G
is sorted by sort -k 1 b to
a-1 b G
a a
N Gandhi Raja [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to compare a variable holding *string* with the *regular
expression *. Is it possible to do in unix with a single command?
Yes, with expr.
$ info coreutils 'String expressions'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE
On Friday 17 February 2006 05:23, N Gandhi Raja wrote:
I want to compare a variable holding *string* with the *regular
expression *. Is it possible to do in unix with a single command?
Can we use test command in UNIX to compare a *string *with the
*regular expression*? if so please provide an
N Gandhi Raja [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we use test command in UNIX to compare a *string *with the
*regular expression*?
No. You might look at 'expr' or 'awk' instead.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
P Kensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is sorted by sort -k 1 a
In general, that's not correct since it sorts by fields 1 through N,
whereas 'join' sorts only by field 1. You need to use sort -k 1b,1
instead. So, as far as I can tell, you haven't found a bug.
However, `-k 1b,1' isn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
