[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
Building CVS corutils on HP-UX 11.11 produces the following test
failure for the inaccessible test. It is expected to fail. But it is
expected to fail with a different message. I am not sure what the
best way to handle differences such as this.
...
Thanks guys, i appreciate your comments back. I understand that
apparently there are other ways, many much simpler, to do what I have done
inside ls.c, however, I like it in ls.c, it's convienent. Almost
any conceivable use of ls can be combined with my new -Z switch,
making it convienent to
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
find $PWD/* -printf '%A@ %p\n'|sort -nr
Wow, learn something every day. Thanks.
Alas, though, this mishandles files whose time stamps differ only in
the subsecond parts, whereas 'ls' by itself would get it right. Looks
like 'find' is another program
Thanks, Andreas. I have filed this as a Debian bug (against glibc) here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373930
A possible workaround for coreutils is to use a path of more than
16384 bytes in length for the test, rather than just more than 4096 --
this is according to Aurelian
On 6/16/06, Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
find $PWD/* -printf '%A@ %p\n'|sort -nr
Wow, learn something every day. Thanks.
Alas, though, this mishandles files whose time stamps differ only in
the subsecond parts, whereas 'ls' by itself would
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Andreas. I have filed this as a Debian bug (against glibc) here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373930
A possible workaround for coreutils is to use a path of more than
16384 bytes in length for the test, rather than just more
Could check for e.g., sleep 4 5
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
bug-bash@gnu.org item related to cat?
Dan Jacobson wrote:
Perhaps bad?
$ cat p
bb
ccc^Z
$ something_else
$ fg
zzz
^D
$ cat pr
bb
zzz
I was not finished composing line ccc when I had to do
something_else. Now I have to remember what I was
Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could check for e.g., sleep 4 5
Sorry, but that's legitimate usage,
so wouldn't want to give a diagnostic about it.
You can currently say sleep 5h 3m 20s.
And sleep 4 5 is equivalent to sleep 9.
Other implementations (e.g., solaris) work the same way.
Could check for e.g., sleep 4 5
This is a well-defined extension of GNU sleep; it is
equivalent to sleep 9. GNU adds its arguments,
so that you can do, for example, 'sleep 1m 30s' to
sleep for 90 seconds.
However, it does raise the point that sleep does not
like negative numbers, even though
C Nothing to do with bash. Depends on how the cat process reacts to the
C SIGTSTP and whether or not the terminal driver even lets cat see the
C partial line, since it's running in cooked mode.
Nor does it have anything to do with cat. It is your terminal
driver that is eating the
11 matches
Mail list logo
