Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N

2006-06-22 Thread Matt Keenan
Eric Blake wrote: uniq(1) used to have an option for checking only a certain number of fields. I have since noticed that some scripts I wrote some time ago have stopped working because the -W / --check-fields=N option has disappeared. Can it please be put back in? It's still there in

Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N

2006-06-22 Thread Pádraig Brady
Matt Keenan wrote: Greetings all, uniq(1) used to have an option for checking only a certain number of fields. I have since noticed that some scripts I wrote some time ago have stopped working because the -W / --check-fields=N option has disappeared. Can it please be put back in? I am happy

error: conflicting types for 'tee'

2006-06-22 Thread Andreas Schwab
The next release of GNU libc will have a declaration of a function tee in fcntl.h (only under _GNU_SOURCE, of course). This will cause a conflict with the use of this name in tee.c: tee.c:34: error: conflicting types for 'tee' /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h:226: error: previous declaration of 'tee'

Re: error: conflicting types for 'tee'

2006-06-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Andreas Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next release of GNU libc will have a declaration of a function tee in fcntl.h (only under _GNU_SOURCE, of course). This will cause a conflict with the use of this name in tee.c: tee.c:34: error: conflicting types for 'tee'

[bug #16913] sleep fails to detect overflow on amd64 / linux 2.6

2006-06-22 Thread anonymous
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=16913 Summary: sleep fails to detect overflow on amd64 / linux 2.6 Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: None Submitted on: Thursday 06/22/2006 at 14:54 UTC

Re: make install using -j

2006-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2006-06/msg00025.html: Not sure about an easy way to fix the first bug as well here. * lib/install-sh: HP-UX 11.23 `mkdir -m u=rwx,[...],u+wx -p' may exit 0 but create intermediate

Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N

2006-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Matt Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Eggert has mentioned that upstream uniq has never had a -W flag. Would you be receptive to a patch? I'm not sure. Does any distribution other than Debian-derived distributions have it? More importantly, what's it used for and useful for?

[bug #16913] sleep fails to detect overflow on amd64 / linux 2.6

2006-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Update of bug #16913 (project coreutils): Status:None = Wont Fix Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: xnanosleep's

f0und aff0rdable medicati0n prices

2006-06-22 Thread Meghan
http://gniiku.weardesk.com/?62783622 o1zxzlghEStXoDpIHJpIW3lN6LK1eOa3kKADbR42Q5SYovOJxImtKWE69nma87fXi6jieYBeqWAw awlUEGNgR9iKHPJ7yqH5L53ZVEmgvrq0j69mkhVBaHNd599FX8Cd2sKPDH58Va8mmW7HsAJuxMVQS6P 7rzJ344OqTCI39hwSAMnWV2scWl55cLGcl16QAEW3OIQ0lt97w1vZ7ROFuv9AKwfzZd89F