Why happens this?? I want to install Cinelerra, and I have this problem. I
have Ubuntu 5.10.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/cinelerra-2.1$ make
make -f build/Makefile.cinelerra
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/o2q/Desktop/cinelerra-2.1'
g++ -o i686/soundtest i686/soundtest.o -lm
make[1]: g++:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roberto Piola wrote:
I was trying to use df in scripts.
Since LVM introduces very long device names, the column with usage% was
floating, so, I modified a little the df utility, by adding the -q switch,
that forces a very small output, without header and with just two
Hauke Brandes wrote:
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #2565 (project coreutils):
This is a really useful feature IMHO. Actually, I made a similar patch myself
and was just checking whether it had already been done. As it is just a small
change and no collisions with other options seem to exist, I
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
'-N _options_, --numeric-sort=_options_'
The other sort options can be attached to -k; how would this work here?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this comment. What
would be attached to -k, and how?
'a': convert numbers with
Logan Hansen wrote:
'sort'ing by name isn't a big deal. 'sort'ing by size, however doesn't
work well do to du's rounding of sizes: du -m and compare a file that's 1k
vs 900k. Further, du -h is quite nice, however, 'sort' can't do *anything*
with the results. Rather than having to write a program
Gorka Bikuña wrote:
Why happens this?? I want to install Cinelerra, and I have this problem. I
have Ubuntu 5.10.
You have addressed your question to the bug-coreutils mailing list.
The GNU coreutils are the basic text, file and shell utilities of the
GNU system. However you do not seem to be
Philip Rowlands wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roberto Piola wrote:
I was trying to use df in scripts.
Since LVM introduces very long device names, the column with usage%
was floating, so, I modified a little the df utility, by adding the
-q switch, that forces a very small output, without
[ dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED] due to bounced mail ]
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roberto Piola wrote:
Philip Rowlands wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roberto Piola wrote:
I was trying to use df in scripts.
Since LVM introduces very long device names, the column with usage% was
floating, so, I
Roberto Piola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I experimented a little with it, but I failed to find a format suitable
for my needs... what I needed was something simple to slice with cut, and
even with -P I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -P
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
'-N _options_, --numeric-sort=_options_'
The other sort options can be attached to -k; how would this work
here?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this comment. What
would be attached to
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
'-N _options_, --numeric-sort=_options_'
The other sort options can be attached to -k; how would this work
here?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
'-N _options_, --numeric-sort=_options_'
The other sort options can be attached to -k; how would this work
here?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean
when encountering dirs missing the executable bit, du used to spit out an
error but continue on its way ... with the new version though, the error
forces premature failure with an helpful message :(
for example, this dir structure as a non-root user:
rm -rf foo
mkdir -p foo/{a,b,c}
touch
On Monday 06 November 2006 16:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
for example, this dir structure as a non-root user:
rm -rf foo
mkdir -p foo/{a,b,c}
touch foo/a/asdf
and `chmod a-x b` of course ...
pgpPm6h0Au7z0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since it seems we've mostly shot down the -N idea in favor of explicit
options
Not at all. I'd rather not chew up a lot of option letters for this
problem, as we're running short of option letters. So having an -N
option (with subletters) is
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since it seems we've mostly shot down the -N idea in favor of explicit
options
Not at all. I'd rather not chew up a lot of option letters for this
problem, as we're running short of option letters. So having an -N
option (with
16 matches
Mail list logo
