cross-partition mv fails with Operation not supported due to ACLs

2007-12-12 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, on a system like this, $ head -1 /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) $ rpm -q glibc-devel glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 $ uname -r 2.6.9-67.ELsmp The coreutils test, tests/mv/part-symlink, fails with this output: -0 mv rem_reg loc_sl (loc_sl) () -0 mv -b

Re: inconsistency in seq

2007-12-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
Vincent Rossetto wrote: Hi I have the coreutils version 5.97. I wonder why the behaviour of seq is different for integer and non-integer INCREMENT. Examples: $ seq 10 10 30 10 20 30 $ seq 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 $ According to the man page, it should be the same result namely

inconsistency in seq

2007-12-12 Thread Vincent Rossetto
Hi I have the coreutils version 5.97. I wonder why the behaviour of seq is different for integer and non-integer INCREMENT. Examples: $ seq 10 10 30 10 20 30 $ seq 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 $ According to the man page, it should be the same result namely the first example, which is correct.