Re: Patch to check for required programs when building from source checkout

2008-10-22 Thread Pádraig Brady
Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/21/2008 4:04 PM: echo $ver | sed ' s/^\([0-9]\{,\}\)\.\([0-9]\{,\}\)[.0]*$/\1.\2.0/; #1.10 - 1.10.0 s/^\([0-9]\{,\}\)\.\([0-9]\{,\}\)\([a-z]\)/\1.\2.99\3/; #1.10a - 1.10.99a For what it's worth, Autoconf does

pwd doesn't support -L or -P

2008-10-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
These two switches are necessary for POSIX compatibility. I note that bash's pwd does support them; is the intention that bash's built-in pwd, which does, should fill this gap in a GNU system? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur (Anon)

Re: pwd doesn't support -L or -P

2008-10-22 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Reuben Thomas on 10/22/2008 6:08 AM: These two switches are necessary for POSIX compatibility. I note that bash's pwd does support them; is the intention that bash's built-in pwd, which does, should fill this gap in a GNU system? It

Re: pwd doesn't support -L or -P

2008-10-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
Here's a suggestion that would be a lot simpler to implement: have pwd implement -P as a no-op, and document the lack of -L, and the conflict with the POSIX default behaviour. I'd be happy to write a documentation patch. That will enlighten users; if anyone cares enough about coreutils's pwd

Re: Patch to check for required programs when building from source checkout

2008-10-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Pádraig Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... latest version is attached (minor tweaks compared to previous). From b9e5fe8076e7a55f152e5ffbd841310ba4994838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:40:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [PATCH] : ls: clarify documentation of exit statuses

2008-10-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good thing I tried to compile before pushing! The above lacks \n\ on the 0 if OK line. It's also lacking a close-parenthesis in the text. Also, that wording is a bit verbose for my taste; the verbosity makes it a

Re: [coreutils] coreutils-7.0 expr exposes long-standing bug in matlab startup script

2008-10-22 Thread Martin Knapp-Cordes
Hello, Eric Blake is correct. I glossed over a short paragraph in the Open Group standard doc page for 'expr' at the end of the 'Application Usage' section where there is a statement that permits something like '-1' to look like an option not the integer, '-1'. This means that the MATLAB

Re: [coreutils] coreutils-7.0 expr exposes long-standing bug in matlab startup script

2008-10-22 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Martin Knapp-Cordes on 10/22/2008 12:17 PM: This means that the MATLAB startup shell script is indeed not Open Group compliant. Obviously, no change will be necessary to the script if the proposed fixes are approved, as they appear to