-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[please keep replies on the list, and don't top-post]
According to Yongsheng Bai on 12/9/2008 8:51 PM:
> Thanks, Sir.
> But, how can I fix this problem?
> -
> split: invalid option -- d
> Try `split --help' for more information.
>
> split
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Yongsheng Bai on 12/9/2008 8:38 PM:
> Dear Sir,
>
> why does split() command has different options in different UniX systems?
> i.e. -a option does not work on some Unix machines...
Your example of 'split -a' is required by POSIX, so it
Dear Sir,
why does split() command has different options in different UniX systems? i.e.
-a option does not work on some Unix machines... Is this because of long option
and short option difference?
Thanks,
YB
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreuti
2008/12/10 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> $ date -d "next `LC_ALL=C date +%A`"
> mercredi 10 décembre 2008, 00:00:00 (UTC+)
^^^
You've just demonstrated that the bug is present in the French
localization as well -- the you got is *today*, not *next* Wednesday,
as it s
Hi,
Regarding to the manpage and comments in rm.c,
the option -I of rm is meant to be the same as --interactive=once
It isn't, since when removing a write-protected file,
rm prompts if --interactive=once is given,
but it doesn't prompt, if -I is given.
This behaviour of rm -I is surprising,
si
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Jan Minář <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> date(1) command parses "next $day_of_week_today" (where
> $day_of_week_today is today's day name) incorrectly:
>
> $ date
> Tue Dec 9 17:16:50 GMT 2008
> $ date -d "next `date +%A`"
> Tue Dec 9 00:00:00 GMT 2008
>
> It
Hi.
date(1) command parses "next $day_of_week_today" (where
$day_of_week_today is today's day name) incorrectly:
$ date
Tue Dec 9 17:16:50 GMT 2008
$ date -d "next `date +%A`"
Tue Dec 9 00:00:00 GMT 2008
It should print the next Tuesday's date, i.e. today + 7 days.
Cheers,
Jan.
Thanks for maintaining a less-than-glorious, but useful utility.
I did check to make sure I was getting the expected version of uname:
which uname
/bin/uname
, but attempting to repeat the symptom got proper behavior!??:
uname -a
Linux cloudy 2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Eric Blake wrote:
The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and/or
Sending mail from an account that adds a disclaimer longer than the body
of your message is considered poor netiquette. This disclaimer is
unenforceable on a publicly archived mailing list,
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #1212 (project coreutils):
http://hotsecretarysex.pornlivenews.com/articles/636683/hot-secretary-in-stocking
Hot secretary in stocking
http://hotsecretarysex.pornlivenews.com/articles/636682/secretary-sex-video
Secretary sex video
http://hotsecretarysex.pornlivenews.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
