Re: tail -f: --pid *and* inotify

Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes: A couple of points: Please move these declarations down into the scope where they are used. It would be better not to perform the kill test after every single select call when actively tailing files. Considering how --pid

Re: BTRFS file clone support for cp

Andreas Schwab wrote: Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes: +#ifdef __linux__ +# define BTRFS_IOC_CLONE 1074041865 This is wrong, the actual value is architecture dependent. You should use the _IOW macro instead. Good point. Thanks! I've adjusted it. Here's the patch I'm considering

Re: BTRFS file clone support for cp

Hi Pádraig, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com writes: How different exactly? OK I tried this myself on F11 with inconclusive results. I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used before and after the clone are the same. Probably yesterday the difference I noticed

Bug report for date

Hi, Gives me correct date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+150 date Wed Jul 22 12:27:15 EDT 2009 Gives me incorrect date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+172 date Tue Jul 28 18:27:09 GMT 2009 Basically I cannot go back more than 6 days...

Re: table of contents of manual contains mistake

Pádraig Brady wrote: Benno Schulenberg wrote: Hi, Instead of showing the six system-context commands under section 21 (http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/index.html#toc_System-context) they are shown under section 22 (SELinux context) and in a slightly different order.

Re: Bug report for date

Paul Grinberg wrote: Gives me correct date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+150 date Wed Jul 22 12:27:15 EDT 2009 Gives me incorrect date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+172 date Tue Jul 28 18:27:09 GMT 2009 Basically I cannot go back more than 6

Re: Bug report for date

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Paul Grinberg wrote: Gives me correct date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+150 date Wed Jul 22 12:27:15 EDT 2009 Gives me incorrect date: [ctpsmg11-dcdhealth@/opt/app/dcdhealth] # TZ=EDT+172 date Tue Jul 28 18:27:09 GMT 2009 Basically I cannot go back

RE: Bug report for date

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Paul Grinberg wrote: Shell script for SolarisIt can go future as long as I want, but past only 6 days

RE: Bug report for date

Bob, Thank you for your reply. You are right, I am trying to calculate time backwardsit only allows 6 days back...i need 7 :) the whole week :) Unfortunately in solaris it does not work :((( # date -R --date=-14 days date: illegal option -- R date: illegal option -- date=-14 days usage:

RE: Bug report for date

Shell script for SolarisIt can go future as long as I want, but past only 6 days http://www.isrcomputing.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid =125:unix-shell-script-to-calculate-date-in-the-future-and-in-the-pastc atid=38:technology-tipsItemid=82 Best, Paul -Original

RE: Bug report for date

Phil, As I said...it is a workaround, since ins Solaris you cannot execute that command: # date -R --date=-14 days date: illegal option -- R date: illegal option -- date=-14 days usage: date [-u] mmddHHMM[[cc]yy][.SS] date [-u] [+format] date -a [-]sss[.fff] Best, Paul

Re: Bug report for date

Paul Grinberg wrote: Thank you for your reply. You are right, I am trying to calculate time backwardsit only allows 6 days back...i need 7 :) the whole week :) Unfortunately in solaris it does not work :((( Well, this is the mailing list for the GNU system's date and so you wouldn't

RE: Bug report for date

Perl is my friend :))) Best, Paul -Original Message- From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:29 PM To: Paul Grinberg Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug report for date Paul Grinberg wrote: Thank you for your reply. You are right, I am trying