Oops. This summary was a little too specific.
From ce1069c2151da3fffc70281a14b96034ba15da5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:26:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] build: use gnulib's freopen module
* bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Add freopen,
Scott McCarty wrote:
All,
Woudl this tool be useful/interesting to the coreutils group? It's not
in C,
but has some unique/novel features. When I saw the program uniq, I did a man
and saw this list. I thought it might be worth a look for the group. If you
are interested, I wrote
Jim Meyering wrote:
Thanks for the review.
BTW, here's the merged version:
And attached one handles the `ls -Ls` case,
which I'll push soon.
cheers,
Pádraig.
From 3edaa2363db0367e8fa472c4dc5c5696537cde61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= p...@draigbrady.com
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Thanks for the review.
BTW, here's the merged version:
And attached one handles the `ls -Ls` case,
which I'll push soon.
cheers,
Pádraig.
From 3edaa2363db0367e8fa472c4dc5c5696537cde61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
Yeah, I kind of thought that, but I at least wanted to put it on your radar.
It has helped me immensely with all kinds of analysis tasks for logs from many
different pieces of software. I like it because it is slightly higher than
coreutils and less than splunk. Hopefully, it will end up in the
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Thanks for the review.
BTW, here's the merged version:
And attached one handles the `ls -Ls` case,
which I'll push soon.
cheers,
Pádraig.
From 3edaa2363db0367e8fa472c4dc5c5696537cde61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 9/30/2009 3:35 PM:
I'm ready to make a 7.7 beta release.
Does anyone have additional changes they'd like to see included?
I'm almost done with a gnulib series to fix rename. If you wait for that,
then 'mv -T file
Jim Meyering wrote:
FYI, I ran make -j9 check on a fast quad-core system earlier
today and saw this failure:
FAIL: tail-2/pid (exit: 1)
==
...
+ timeout 1 tail -s.1 -f /dev/null --pid=2147483647
+ test 124 = 124
+ fail=1
To me, that
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
FYI, I ran make -j9 check on a fast quad-core system earlier
today and saw this failure:
FAIL: tail-2/pid (exit: 1)
==
...
+ timeout 1 tail -s.1 -f /dev/null --pid=2147483647
+ test 124 = 124
+
