Re: [PATCH]: chcon: no longer abort on SELinux disabled kernel

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: Stephen Smalley wrote: ... Must have previously booted an ancient kernel with SELinux permissive and no policy loaded. Kernel was fixed by the commit below in 2006. I'd recommend that he run the following to clean up the droppings in his filesystem: find / \( -fstype

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: Pádraig Brady P at draigBrady.com writes: ln: creating hard link `hardlink' = `symlink': Invalid argument `man linkat` says that AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW is only supported since 2.6.18 and my FC5 system is 2.6.17 Bingo. For FC5, I need to implement rpl_linkat in gnulib, which

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/5/2009 3:53 PM: This is a new test, but FC5 is s old, that I'm not sure it's worth worrying about. March 2006? The failure is probably a function of the kernel. Which is it? In summary this is what fails: $ touch a $ ln -s a symlink

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Pádraig Brady
Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/5/2009 3:53 PM: This is a new test, but FC5 is s old, that I'm not sure it's worth worrying about. March 2006? The failure is probably a function of the kernel. Which is it? In summary this is what fails: $ touch

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
Pádraig Brady wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/5/2009 3:53 PM: This is a new test, but FC5 is s old, that I'm not sure it's worth worrying about. March 2006? The failure is probably a function of the kernel. Which is it? In summary this is

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 10/06/2009 11:05 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Also a minor nit in s/Linux/Gnu\/Linux/ Definitely not when it's talking explicitly of a kernel version? Paolo

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Pádraig Brady
Jim Meyering wrote: Pádraig Brady wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/5/2009 3:53 PM: This is a new test, but FC5 is s old, that I'm not sure it's worth worrying about. March 2006? The failure is probably a function of the kernel. Which is

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Pádraig Brady
Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 10/06/2009 11:05 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Also a minor nit in s/Linux/Gnu\/Linux/ Definitely not when it's talking explicitly of a kernel version? Right, it could be GNU/Linux or Linux kernels? (.*)? cheers, Pádraig.

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.6.63-addb6

2009-10-06 Thread Simon Josefsson
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com writes: Jim Meyering wrote: Pádraig Brady wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Pádraig Brady on 10/5/2009 3:53 PM: This is a new test, but FC5 is s old, that I'm not sure it's worth worrying about. March 2006? The failure is

please verify

2009-10-06 Thread Chandan Kumar
I am getting some faults while doing CAL command, i.e. i am getting some leap years in case of non-leap years i.e. the years like 1000,500,1500,1700 etc     From cricket scores to your friends. Try the Yahoo! India Homepage! http://in.yahoo.com/trynew

coreutils-8.0 released [beta]

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
This is to announce coreutils-8.0. We're calling this a beta release partly because rm has been rewritten (now it uses gnulib's fts for its hierarchy traversal), and partly because there have been so many changes in the gnulib infrastructure involving file-system primitives. Thanks to everyone

Re: please verify

2009-10-06 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Chandan Kumar wrote: I am getting some faults while doing CAL command, cal is not part of GNU coreutils. i.e. i am getting some leap years in case of non-leap years i.e. the years like 1000,500,1500,1700 etc 1700 is a leap year, and leap years predating 1582 (the

[PATCH] maint: make release-making instructions more generic

2009-10-06 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, From d183a15cbb26691e0a05bab06ab700ec46fcfba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:49:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] maint: make release-making instructions more generic * README-release: Make instructions more generic. --- README-release |

Re: [PATCH] ls: don't use an undefined struct stat after failed stat/lstat

2009-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com writes: -human_readable (ST_NBLOCKS (f-stat), buf, human_output_opts, -ST_NBLOCKSIZE, output_block_size)); +! f-stat_ok ? ? +: human_readable (ST_NBLOCKS (f-stat), buf, human_output_opts, +

Re: [FEATURE_REQUEST] support openssl checksum format too

2009-10-06 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jim, was still something wrong with my last patch? Günter.