bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable

2016-02-17 Thread Jim Meyering
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Mike Hodson wrote: >>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Bernhard Voelker >>wrote: >>> On 02/16/2016 11:50 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >>> [...] We don't want those single quotes. >> >> >> Who exactly is "we"? >> >> I

bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable

2016-02-17 Thread Mike Hodson
>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Bernhard Voelker >wrote: >> On 02/16/2016 11:50 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> [...] We don't want those single quotes. > > > Who exactly is "we"? > > I can only speak for myself: I'm don't really care too much about > what output

bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable

2016-02-17 Thread isabella parakiss
On 2/17/16, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 17 Feb 2016 01:41, isabella parakiss wrote: >> On 2/17/16, Ruediger Meier wrote: >> > As already said in practice it is already configurable by different >> > kind >> > of distro-specific techniques or shell aliases. For